Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Sunday, March 26, 2006

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (16 comment(s))

OUT OF THE SHADOWS: Sex offenders and the La Crosse community


.
They are our neighbors, customers, co-workers, family members and friends.

And under current laws, authorities are permitted to inform the public of their release. Now personal information is accessible to the curious and concerned in cyberspace.
Since the state’s first registered sex offender was released in

La Crosse under public notification laws in 1998, communities and released sex offenders have engaged in an uneasy dance. Of the 18,221 registered sex offenders in Wisconsin, 183 — all but five are men — call La Crosse home.

Sex offender therapists agree that the community doesn’t distinguish between the severity of offenses, and that’s a problem. They assume all sex offenders are child molesters or sexual psychopaths.

And after they have served their time, offenders face their own struggles as they attempt to readapt to the community.

Sex offenders banned

The La Crosse Area Family YMCA has shut its doors to sex offenders. After four months of discussion, the board of directors banned sex offenders last month.

Executive Director Bill Soper said the organization began discussing the ban in November at the recommendation of the YMCA of the USA.

Arnold Collins, spokesman for the YMCA of the USA, said the organization recommends the termination of sex offenders’ memberships and ban of future ones because “the safety of children is so important to YMCAs.”

Soper said the local YMCA discussed the issues of statutory rape and the possibility of making exceptions in some cases. Ultimately, the board took a zero-tolerance stance.

Of the YMCA’s 8,300 members, five males were convicted sex offenders, Soper said.

The offenders were sent a letter explaining the termination. The YMCA plans to announce the ban to members in its spring newsletter.

Soper said the ban was a logical step to make because it minimizes the risk to members.

“We would never hire an offender, so why should we have them in the building?” Soper said.

The YMCA will check new member applications against the National Sex Offender Registry before anyone is admitted.

It is not known how many of the 2,594 national branches of the YMCA have passed the ban.

Offenders aren’t welcome at Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Coulee Region, either. Executive Director Beth Twiton said anyone convicted of a crime against another person is ineligible for the program.

At least one male who applied last year was a sex offender. Twiton said it’s unclear whether he wanted to be a Big Brother because he had rebuilt his life and wanted to help, or because he wanted to get close to children.

“We fear the latter,” Twiton said. “Child safety is our top priority.”

Keeping track

Mike Johnson, a registration specialist with the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, has worked with hundreds of registered sex offenders in his 14 years with the department.

The department works to protect the community from offenders by making them abide by a strict set of rules through probation or parole, Johnson said. The department also sends a letter at least once a year to the last known address of the offender requesting verification, he said.

The public notification process begins shortly before an offender is released from prison, when they are entered into the sex offender registry, Johnson said.

Depending on the severity of the offense, the state notifies the police department or other agencies. Serious offenders require community-wide notification in an open forum.

Electronic monitoring and a pilot Global Positioning System allow the department to track offenders, Johnson said.

Will they re-offend?

While victims and the community often fear the presence of sex offenders because they believe they’re likely to re-offend, government data shows released sex offenders are less likely than other criminals to commit another crime.

The U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics compiled what it says is the largest study of its type in October 2003 on re-arrest, reconviction and re-imprisonment among 9,691 male sex offenders. Subjects were tracked for three years after their release from 15 state prisons.

A similar study was conducted by the bureau the same year, tracking 272,111 released prisoners who committed crimes of all types.

According to Bureau of Justice Statistics:

  • Of the 9,691 male sex offenders released from prisons in 15 states in 1994, 5.3 percent were re-arrested for a new sex crime within three years.

  • About 67 percent of the 272,111 prisoners released in 1994 were re-arrested within three years. The rate was 61 percent among all violent offenders.

  • Sex offenders were less likely than non-sex offenders to be rearrested for any offense — 43 percent of sex offenders vs. 68 percent of non-sex offenders.

    The registry

    Heather and Robert Edwards, their daughters, 6 years and 7 months, and son, 4, moved into an apartment on McHugh Road in Holmen, Wis., in early March. They had no idea that a 35-year-old man convicted of second-degree sexual assault of a child in May 2001 lived two doors down.

    A neighbor warned Heather Edwards. She has never seen the offender, but said it’s unsettling to know he’s close.

    “I’ve woken up and made my husband check the locks, and I’m not a paranoid person,” Heather Edwards said. “If I had known, I wouldn’t have moved here.”

    For people like the Edwardses, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections’ Sex Offender Registry — the official state sex offender Web site — means sex offenders can’t legally hide.

    Anyone convicted of a sexual offense on or after Dec. 25, 1993, is required to register and must remain on the registry for at least 15 years. The first time an offender will be removed will be in 2008.

    The department added home addresses of registered sex offenders to the online registry Dec. 1. Since that time, Web site traffic has tripled to an average of 75,000 hits each week, Gov. Jim Doyle said.

    Doyle announced in late February the state’s Sex Offender Accountability and Felony Enforcement Initiative tracked down more than 400 sex offenders who failed to comply with the registry.

    The SAFE initiative raised Wisconsin’s compliance rate for the registry to 88 percent, compared with 76 percent nationally, Doyle added.

    But sex offenders can escape the registry.

    “They exist,” Johnson said. “But they might not know the obligation to the registry or know the complexity of the laws.”

    La Crosse was the first city in Wisconsin to house a released sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Law in 1998, Police Chief Ed Kondracki said. He said the department should release as much information about the offender as permissible under state law.

    “Anonymity spurs criminal acts,” Kondracki said. “I believe our community likes to receive our information.”

    Megan’s Law, an amendment to the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offenders Act, was passed in 1996 and mandates all states develop notification protocols that allow public access to information about sex offenders, according to the Department of Corrections.

    The law was named after 7-year-old Megan Kanka, who was raped and murdered by a twice-convicted child molester in her New Jersey neighborhood in 1994.

    “Forewarned is forearmed,” Kondracki said. “We ought to know who our neighbors are.”

    The Department of Corrections stresses that notification and the registry are not intended for residents to use the information to injure, harass or commit crimes against people in the registry, their families or employers.

    On the Web

    The dissemination of information about sex offenders has led to the proliferation of Web sites that map offenders’ locations.

    One of the most popular sites is www.mapsexoffenders.com, a family-run site based in Orem, Utah. The family downloads an updated offender list from the national registry once a week for 42 states, including Wisconsin and Minnesota, but will soon update daily, site employee Mark Olsen said.

    The free Web site allows users to search for offenders by address. Each offender is highlighted with a red balloon and users can click the balloon to view the offender, photo and current address. The map provides a link to state registries for additional information.

    The site also runs an alphabetized list of sex offenders by name in each ZIP code with a hyperlink to show the offender’s location. Users can sign up for e-mail alerts. Olsen said the site can get 100,000 hits on a busy day.

    Olsen’s family started the site in summer 2005 after they joined more than 3,000 volunteers searching for a missing 11-year-old Utah Boy Scout Brennan Hawkins in June 2005. Before he was found alive four days later, the Utah news media speculated that Hawkins was abducted by a sex offender. His family was unable to find user-friendly Web sites.

    La Crosse Police Capt. Rob Abraham said his department wants to produce a similar map for the department’s Web site.

    “We see our Web site as a service to the community and a map would follow that,” Abraham said.

    Challenges, struggles

    La Crosse sex offender therapists counsel hundreds of released sex offenders each year. Offenders struggle with readjustment and personal problems as they attempt to readapt to the community.

    Terry Marshall, ATTIC Correctional Services chief executive officer and president, has worked with hundreds of recently released sex offenders in his 24 years with the organization. ATTIC provides transitional housing, day reporting and treatment.

    Marshall said the most difficult obstacle offenders face is housing. They must abide by the rules of their probation or parole, which can restrict them from living near their families or where children are present. It’s not uncommon for landlords to deny the offender residence either.

    Ron McGuire, executive director and senior therapist of Ron McGuire Family Therapy Center, has been treating sex offenders for 37 years and estimates he sees about 300 each year.

    It’s often difficult for his clients to find employment, though they’re well qualified, McGuire said. The chances for the position are good until they have to check the felony box, McGuire said. “It’s amazing how many don’t hear from the job again,” he said.

    Marshall added that offenders must find employment without interaction with people who would cause concern.

    A lack of employment immediately leads to financial struggles, he said.

    Johnson said offenders are no longer accustomed to everyday tasks, such as grocery shopping, and must take time to ease back into society. “Some hit the panic button within a day or two,” Johnson said.

    They also suffer from fear and paranoia, feeling isolated from the community, McGuire said. “(La Crosse) is a relatively small town and they believe they’re in the public eye,” he said.

    Offenders also experience personal feelings of inadequacy and shame, blame and guilt — “and they should feel some of that,” McGuire said.

    Jim LaJeunesse, director and family therapist of the Center for Effective Living and a member of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, has counseled juvenile sex offenders who committed crimes against family members and are attempting to rejoin the family. He estimates he has counseled hundreds of offenders since he came to La Crosse in 1979.

    Ostracized offenders are at greater risk of acting out sexually, LaJeunesse said. “Those who are socially isolated are at a greater risk for sexually deviant behavior,” he said.

    The registry can lead the offender to feel discriminated against and labeled as a leper or monster, LaJeunesse said.

    With proper treatment, LaJeunesse said, juvenile offenders are rarely a threat to society.

    The community

    People who deal with offenders agree La Crosse is responsible and generally reasonable as offenders try to readjust to the community.

    Johnson believes the offenders are “treated fairly.”

    “But there’s still a grudge held by a lot of people,” Johnson said.

    “When people see an offender that is really motivated to turn their life around, they’re treated pretty decent.”

    McGuire said he’s proud of the way La Crosse treats sex offenders. On a scale of one to 10, with 10 representing full acceptance, McGuire believes the community falls in the 6.5 to 7.5 range. “La Crosse has worked to understand (sex offenders),” McGuire said. “I feel good about that.”

    But Johnson said the community tends to lump all offenders into the most dangerous group and fears recidivism.

    “They feel once an offender, always an offender,” McGuire said. “I hope the community will take the time to look at each individual offender.”

    Offenders who have served their sentences should be given a chance, Marshall said.

    “You really want to know what kind of offender your neighbor is,” Marshall said. “Offenders hide in silence and in the shadows. If we bring them out of the shadows, it’s better for them and the community.”

    LaJeunesse recommends researching the offense and age of the victim, then evaluating the risk of reoffending before ostracizing sex offenders.

    “Our community has been willing to maintain an open mind when it comes to offenders,” Kondracki said. “The community ought to give the individual a chance to rehabilitate.”

    Anne Jungen can be reached at (608) 791-8224 or ajungen@lacrossetribune.com.
    .
  •  Advertisement 
     Tell us what you think...

     Comments »

    Jordan wrote on Jul 2, 2007 2:03 AM:

    " Scott-- I hear what you're saying, and whole-heartedly agree with you. There is a HUGE difference between a sick, vicious, predatory child molester -- and someone who unwittingly walked into a situation such as you describe, or someone who--say--committed a "prom-night indiscretion" with their younger, but very willing & consenting, date. The laws need to be changed to recognize this. Un-Christian as it may be, I wouldn't budge a centimeter out of my way to save the life of anyone I knew to be a true child molester. People such as you though... Well, in all honesty, I'd love to slap you upside the head for not having been more judicious & careful--but you DO NOT deserve to be punished for the rest of your life. That's way wrong under the circumstances. God bless you, son. "

    Scott wrote on Feb 28, 2007 9:50 AM:

    " I met a girl at a night club where your supposed to be 21. She was 14 dressed very adult like. Now my life is ruined. I cant get a job, apartment, and the YMCA bans me too. Why not just kill me because life for me is not worth living anymore. The registry is going to punish me for the rest of my life. I don't want to live like this anymore. This is the reason I have no will to go on. "

    anonymous wrote on Mar 29, 2006 9:54 AM:

    " I hate child molesters. I always have. When I was a child one of this states most notorious sex offenders was brought to justice for molesting many many young boys. Two of them happened to be my best friends. It has scarred them for life, and changed them in ways they may never really know. This pedophile was given the maximum sentence for his crimes, well for the crimes they could convict him on. It was justice at it's finest, he may never see the free light of day and the world is better for it. He victimized boys and girls from the ages of 3 to 14 for years and the few charges the law was able to convict him on were just barely adequate to put him away indefinately. With this in my past you would think that I would believe in locking up all sex offenders for life, but I have been forced to look a little closer at the differences between one offense and another. Some time ago my wife and I were going through a very rough time in our marraige. She was seeing other men and my own personal life was falling apart. I was very depressed and not sure where my life was heading. It seemed that the family I had wanted with this woman was just a lie I she had fed me. At the same time there was a person ,a girl, who was under the age of 18 and had been a good friend of ours for some time. She was and may still be one of the closest friends I have ever had. Anyway she was also very much in love with me. We had an affair. Later, my wife and I patched up our marraige. The 'minor' remained a very close friend but I was able to break off all 'sexual relations' as gently to her as possible. My marriage is better than it has ever been and I am very proud to say that I will soon be a new father, YAAYY! It is an awesome feeling see this new life growing in my wife. However I am also facing criminal charges for the actions I took with my friend the 'minor'. It will be a miracle if I am not placed on the sex offender registry and categorized with the same child raping, little boy molesting, pedophile scum bag who destroyed the lives of my childhood friends. So now I am the person I have always hated, I am that scumbag jerk. I am also a loving father-to-be and a devoted husband to my expectant wife. I know some people will cry for my blood and lifetime incarceration and others have already come to my side to offer support and understanding. I have come to see the things I did as a series of horrible mistakes made at time when I was very unsure about my life as a whole. I wish I could go back and undo it, be the stronger man, just not let anything happen and keep my good friendship with the 'victim' nothing more than a good friendship. So there you have it. I am a sex offender, my victim was underage, the complaints against me are the same that would have been brought against a child molester or pedophile and when you see me on the registry you won't see a good family man, you'll see a scum bag villian. "

    Muntz X wrote on Mar 27, 2006 9:37 AM:

    " bill in Maryville: I like your idea. The beauty of putting an S on their chests is that the offender can read it from his perspective. That way he can never forget what he has done, just like his victim. "

    To: Pariah wrote on Mar 26, 2006 8:50 PM:

    " You too my friend are in a fantasy world. "Something wrong" and Having SEX with babies. What is your definition of Sex with a child? It's more than something wrong. You are wrong. The sytem is wrong, this whole stinking thing about rehabing a child molester with a 2 year stint is a bunch of B.S.! Give me a break! They offend, re-offend, and than re-offend again. We will never know about the ones they violate and get away with it. When a child does "wrong" we correct them and guide them. We direct them in the direction of "right". Hopefuly they stay they course. The one who enters into a child must be locked up for GOOD. NO EXCEPTIONS! It's worse than murder. Imagine a 4 year old little firl or boy with a grown man on top of them, having their Way with the child. They ge the pleasure of this twisted nasty fantasy. They premditate this crime over and over in evry thought they have. You can not tell me they have no control. They are beasts! They have no regard for a child and the families of the child. All they care about is acting out the crime for their HUGE pleasure. They are scum. The lowest forms of life. If you want them to have a second chance, you house them with you and your family. This man "John" has a girlfriend who has children. If he lays a hand on them, he gets his second chance. As a matter of fact he already had a second and third chance. He will have another chance as the years go on. After all they claim they can not control it. As long as he can perform he will have his fantasies. Wake up Pariah! "

    to pariah wrote on Mar 26, 2006 4:07 PM:

    " something wrong and rape are two very different things. Let's face it folks, look up the definition of first and second degree sexual assault, they are both rape. Let's call it what it is. Sexual assault doesn't "just happen" it takes thought and planning. This shows intent. Not like a child making a mistake, there's no mistake about it. If it were a mistake they wouldn't go to lengths to keep their crimes secret. They know what they are going to do long before they do it. And if they can't get control of themselves before they commit their first crime, they don't deserve our trust, they already threw it away. Branded for life? You bet! Or they can come live with you, your wife, your mother, your sister, your daughter. "

    The sex offender vs. THE SEX OFFENDER wrote on Mar 26, 2006 2:59 PM:

    " There is a huge gray area when it comes to sex crimes. Yes we all know in our hearts. I agree. The young boy and girl who are under age and fall in love have sex, mom finds out and calls the cops. Boy goes to jail and now is branded for life. This should not be. We need to be teching our kids that sex outside of marriage is wrong. Or, if you do not have that view, at least teach the child that they should wait until they are at least 20 years of age. (I am for God and Marriage) What you beileve is your business. Now what about the person who violates a child by molestation? As far as I am concerned, this should be a minimum 20 year sentence. I would rather lock the molester up than the druggie or drug dealer, of course there are severe crimes they too committ. But my view is molesting is more of a serious crime than a druggie using drugs. I have no problem with my tax dollars going for rehab on the druggie. I have no problem housing a child, baby sex offender, rapist or women beater for many, many, many years. As I stated, 20 at a minimum for the molester and rapist. I speek from experience. I was molested as a young boy at the age of five. I am and have always been a productive tax paying citzen. Never once thought of doing what was done to me. That is to easy of a cop out, this act is perversion and that is that! They afre not sick, they are not "special" in anyway shape or form. They are perverted with sexual crime in their minds. They offend this way because it brings THEM pleasure. Well, they got their plaesure. Now it's time to suffer just as the young boy or little girl suffered at the hands and perverted mind of the molester. I suffered and got on with my life. However, the thoughts stay with you for life. I am now 41 years old. Guess what? I can remember as if it were 2 hours ago. It stays with you. The pain goes away as each minute goes by. Notice I said minute. Because it is a life time. My offender was never caught. How do I know. It was a close "friend" of the family. This person died without ever being punished. Another guess what. This person molested my older brother also. So do not tell me that they desrve a second chance. They desrve a chance at life in prison. No exceptions! "

    df- What? wrote on Mar 26, 2006 2:31 PM:

    " Come on! What is your problem? Get real! Any Christain Establishments do not let child molesters roam the premises freely because their are children playing. Their are some who do not need supervision who can be easily overpowered in a locker room by a pervert! That is only one of a million reasons why. They are a private organization. If they do not want people who want to have sex with babies in the building than they have the right to ban them. If you have a child why don't you house a child moleter. I mean come on, he needs a place to stay when he gets done serving his two week jail sentence from the first, second, third and fourth offense. It usually requires sex with a child and than killing the child before he serves a max of 4 or five years. Your in a fantasy world if you think that this is wrong. What about the child that was molested? I know, I was a victim of this SICK crime! I didn't grow up molesting children because I too was molested. That kind of excuse is a cop out. If you trust these people so much, you live with one. Put your child in their care. The Y is doing what they feel is best for the children in their community. My hat is off to them for having the guts to tell these clowns they can't do their nasty little deeds in their house! So they do not trust them with the kids. Would you? Evidently you do. Otherwise you would be for this decission. If they want to work out, swim or whatever, they can build and finance their own X,Y OR Z, or whatever. And, they can and should put a sign out front that states, "This estabilsment is for the Child Molesters Only"! That whay they won't get harrassed. Hows that sound? Heck, if I had the money I would do it myself. I have no problem with that. As long as I could adverstise that a bunch of perverts excercised there. Your problem is that you do not like Christians. Anything that has Christian Attatched to it and Your beating them and throwing your rocks are you not? If you do not care or believe, that's fine. But do not expect us to open our arms to child molester just because they did a few weeks in jail and they say they are rehabed. I believe they can change. But only with Christ. That is the only way. Anything else and it is all a lie! Blessings to you. "

    pariah wrote on Mar 26, 2006 2:08 PM:

    " Why even bother to try and be a productive member of society and rehabilitate? Next time your kid does something wrong, punish him or her for the rest of their life for it and see what kind of antisocial psychopath you create. "

    df wrote on Mar 26, 2006 1:00 PM:

    " No wonder rehabilitation of people such as sex offenders is very difficult in our society with the way some employers and organizations such as the YMCA act. The Young Men's Christian Association does not seem very Christian when it throws a person out for a prior misdeed. I suppose if it was not a sex related crime but a robbery or homicide the person could remain a member. I don't believe the "Y" should be part of the United Way campaign with that policy! "

    Brenda wrote on Mar 26, 2006 12:12 PM:

    " I feel that the offenders that commit these sex crimes against children elderly and rapes should be known. However as one of the people stated above there are situations where 17 and 19 year olds have dated for years and then something happens and guess who gets it. I think there should be more information on these webs sites and flyers they had out as well as when they are put on tv to say they are being released. I think it should say so and so is being released and he sexually offended a 7 years old or a 80 year old person ore beat and raped a women. Then I think they should also say when joe blow gets out he did time for having sex with his girlfreind of many years and some of the circumstances around that. The public cannot make an informed decsion without some facts. The facts on the web site for sexual offenders as well as the WCCAP web site is general. The only way you know is by going to court for every case and that is just not possiable. Or the other way is to talk to the offender. That as well because of fear on both parts will not happen. We are judging with out the facts. It is wrong and we all know in our hearts is is. I am not saying love them or support them I am saying know who you are saying these things about before you just judge blindly. It is not all black and white , or open and closed sometimes it really is a gray area. "

    bill in Maryville wrote on Mar 26, 2006 9:26 AM:

    " Why not make all registered sex offenders wear a big S on their chests -- and a bull's eye on their backs -- forever? "

    Thanks wrote on Mar 26, 2006 9:02 AM:

    " I appreciate the disspassionate viewpoint taken in your article. The problem with this particular offense and an intelligent discussion is the emotional nature and the viewpoint that the victim lives with this for life. Victims of all crimes live with them for life. The strong get over the feeling of vulnerable victimization and get on with living their lives. Don'r say it can't be done - look at the many normal people who don't feel victimized until some psycholigist "discovers" that they were molested. And, look at the many who genuinely were molested who have decided not to let the molester "get away with it" every day by allowing themselves to wallow in victimization. "

    Amy wrote on Mar 26, 2006 7:41 AM:

    " I agree, these people deserve what they get. I hope their struggles get worse as they go on. I have no sympathy for them. My heart goes out to their victims. Lock them up for life as far as I'm concerned poor babies. The bible says the only unforgivable sin is not believing in the Jesus Christ. I wish child molestation and kid killers were also unforgiveable. Jerks! "

    Statistics are bogus wrote on Mar 26, 2006 7:32 AM:

    " The stats in this story is non-sense. What a joke. The story tells us that some of the sex offenders are not child molesters. Lets do a study on uncle pervy alone. Lets see how many times he re-offends. Don not include the young man who was 18 and got caught having sex with his 17 year old girlfriend. Or the young man whom is 19, dating a 17 year-old, the girls parents hate the young man so they decide to "get" the boy. He winds up a sex offender. Well you know what. He is not. Teenagers dating and having sex is not uncommon. It's been this way since who knows when. It's nothing new. I'm not saying I am for these kids having sex. I'm against pre-marital sex as a matter of fact. However, I can't see doing a study on the offenders including these type of offenders in with the rapist, child molester and women beaters. You just can not compare the two. The pervert who violates little children, the jerk who forces himself on women, little girls and boys are the ones who end up re-offending. And those stats are high. We just don't know it because by the time the, (profanity) gets caught it looks as if he has violated only once. He just didn't get caught the other one hundred times. By the way I am a male, men are not the only ones who committ child molestation. When I was five, my female baby-sitter was a child molester. I know, she molestad me. Child molesters, I believe are in the same catagory as murders, lock them up for life the first time! "

    Amy wrote on Mar 26, 2006 6:47 AM:

    " Sex offenses are among the worst offenses there are. These offenses need to discouraged and people need to know that if they commit such an offense, they will have to struggle to be accepted in society again. It will and should be difficult. That's the price they should pay for commiting such a heinous crime==especially against children. Punishment should fit the crime!!! If you don't want the struggle, don't do the crime. The victims are forced to deal with this the rest of your life. The criminal made a choice to commit. "


    PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
    The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

    Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

     Post a comment (150 word limit) »

    Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
    Member ID:
    *Password:
      Forgot Your Password?
     
    Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

    **Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

    Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

    Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

    Create a Member ID:
    *Choose a password:
    *Re-enter password:
    E-mail Address:
    Year of Birth:
     

    (children under 13 cannot register)

    First Name:
    Last Name:
    Company:
    Home Phone:
    Business Phone:
    Address:
    City:
    State:
    Zip Code:
     

    NEWSPAPER ADS

    LACROSSE JOBS

    TOP HOMES

     
     
    Dailies
    La Crosse Tribune
    Winona Daily News

    Weeklies
    Coulee News
    The Chronicle
    Holmen Courier
    Houston County News
    Onalaska Life
    Tomah Journal
    Vernon Broadcaster
    Westby Times

    Regional
    Inside Preps
    My LIVE! Entertainment
    Best of River Valley
    Business Report
    Healthy Living Today
    Strictly Golf
    River Valley Bike Trails
    River Valley Blogs
    River Valley Outdoors

    Shoppers
    Tri-County Foxxy

    Marketplace
    Newspaper Ads
    Local Website Directory
    7 Rivers Rentals
    HomeSeller
    Wheels Website
    Work For You

    Portals
    La Crosse NET
    Winona NET

    Classifieds
    River Valley Classifieds

    Links
    Lee Enterprises

    About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
    Copyright © 1997 - 2007 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
    Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.