Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Sunday, March 26, 2006

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (28 comment(s))

Released sex offender takes life one step at a time


.
He’s shy and blushes when you ask him about his fiancee. He works long hours overnight at a factory. He exudes positive energy. And this North Side resident can wail on a guitar.

But he’s also a 50-year-old convicted sex offender, found guilty of attempted child enticement.
John, who spoke to the Tribune on the condition his real name not be used, was the first person released in La Crosse under the Wisconsin Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Law in 1998. For the past eight years, John has dealt with the repercussions of his offense and eased his way back into the community — one step at a time.

“Sex offenders want it all at once — work, a house, friends, everything, and that’s not going to happen,” he said. “You have to be patient. Offenders won’t get it all back at once — if ever.”

While some people will never forgive and accept, John believes La Crosse residents are fair in their treatment of offenders.

Still, he fears the community will consider him unredeemable, pigeonhole him and victimize his loved ones.

John was convicted of three counts of attempted enticement of children in 1989 and placed on probation. His probation was revoked after he was charged again in February 1993 with attempted enticement for leaving a note in the street inviting the finder to meet him near Myrick Park so he could expose himself, according to Tribune archives.

After revoking his probation, former La Crosse County Circuit Judge Peter Pappas sentenced him to seven years in prison. John pleaded guilty to the 1993 charge and Judge Michael Mulroy placed him on probation for five years.

He was released from the Wisconsin State Prison System in June 1997 into an apartment on Rose Street operated by ATTIC Correctional Services, where he stayed until he was transferred to the La Crosse County Jail in mid-October 1997 because of rules violations. His parole was revoked in January 1998 and he was sent back to prison. He was released again on Oct. 6, 1998.

John lived with his mother in her South Side home after his release. Soon after he arrived, the pair noticed a change in attitude from the usually friendly neighbors.

Neighbors even met with their alderman to express concerns about his placement. Some circulated a petition to ask the Wisconsin Department of Corrections to reconsider the placement.

He said he has been lucky enough to find jobs, but it hasn’t been easy.

“When you have to fill out that question, you know — ‘Have you ever been convicted of a felony? — it’s hard,” John said. “And then you have to explain what it is.”

He has lost old friends because they felt betrayed. His closest friends now are his co-workers.

John establishes a trusting relationship with new friends before he tells them of the offense. Whether they accept him, he said, depends on how he approaches them.

“The whole difference is the attitude,” he said.

His positive attitude attracted his fiancee, Mary, 42, also not her real name, at work in 2002. She remembers how shy and nervous he was when he asked her out on their first dinner date.

John knew after the date that Mary was girlfriend material. He also knew he had to be honest about his past. “If I think that I’m great now, then why shouldn’t I tell her?” he said.

Still, he remembers stalling the revelation on their second date. When he finally told Mary, she accepted the offense and didn’t judge him on his past.

But Mary had five kids. Once the parole agent approved of their relationship and his presence around her children, the couple had to be honest with her kids. Mary told her children they didn’t have to love John, but they had to treat him with respect.

“There was such mixed reaction,” Mary said. “I told them that they couldn’t judge him for his past — that I didn’t see that in him.”

Some of Mary’s children have accepted John, but others refuse to be around him. That hurts, John said.

He said offenders must constantly monitor their actions and their emotional state.

“When offenders isolate themselves, it can lead to alcohol and drug use and pornography,” John said.

He isn’t fond of sex offender location Web sites such as www.mapsexoffenders.com, but he said they come with the territory.

“It’s not something to broadcast. The people who need to know, know,” he said.

John said his family was supportive so he didn’t succumb to loneliness, and therapy and group sessions have kept him on the right track. Empathy for others, the fact that he doesn’t want to victimize his friends and family, and a desire to change prevent him from re-offending.

“It doesn’t fit the standards I’ve set for myself,” he said.

He wants other sex offenders to know that treatment can only be successful if they want to change. John encourages offenders to stay busy, follow the rules and to learn empathy for each other as they readjust to society.

“Everything is not fine and dandy, and it won’t ever be. Period,” he said. “But you have to stay positive and keep pushing on.”
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

To: John Jay Austine wrote on Apr 2, 2006 10:13 AM:

" Jesus says not to hurt children. Jesus suggests God doesn't forgive harming children. Now WHO is it you want us to forive? Oh yeah childmolesters. UM NO! "

John Jay Austine wrote on Mar 29, 2006 1:19 AM:

" God forgives us cant we now forgive our brother? "

To change.... wrote on Mar 28, 2006 3:32 PM:

" Change is possible, however highly unlikely. No I don't know the name of the study, but you can bet I will soon, but over the past 20 years there have been multiple news stories on TV with studies of imprisoned sex offenders. ALL of the offenders interviewed said they never stopped thinking about offending, even if they didn't always act on it. There wasn't anything to change their thought processes or desires (they described it as a desire). If the movie keeps playing in their heads, how long are you willing to put victims in front of him until he starts acting on it? "

Change isn't possible? wrote on Mar 28, 2006 12:52 PM:

" If you believe or say that people can't change for the better... then do you also believe and say that people can't change for the worse? Those who deny the possiblilty of change are the ones I fear most of not recognizing their own actions... I've always been a good person, I can't possibly do something bad, wrong, or evil therefore I don't need to think about what I'm doing... Never let your guard down. And so yes, this works both ways... just becuase a person may have changed from bad to the better, it doesn't mean they can't change back to bad again... just be vigilant and never let your guard down. This goes to John, Mary, and everyone of us... Let's just try not to be mean. "

To ALL Fact claimers... wrote on Mar 28, 2006 12:47 PM:

" Please site your sources of facts. This goes for both sides. Thanks. "

To Heather wrote on Mar 28, 2006 12:44 PM:

" Heather you state [as fact] "It has been proven that sex offenders cannot be rehabilitated". Could you please supply a referenc? I'm not trying to start a flame war nor argue one way or the other (whether John is a good guy or a bad guy, nor whether this situation is good or bad)... I'm just interested in securing the truth (and facts). Thanks. "

There's something about Mary wrote on Mar 28, 2006 12:29 PM:

" To quote the article: "Mary told her kids they didn't have to love John, but they do have to respect him." No Mom of the Year awards being handed out here, folks. You cannot FORCE respect, it must be earned. The children that don't want to be around John are smarter than the Mom. Hopefully those kids are looking out for the other kids. I agree with the comment that we don't know how many crimes this man got away with. I do applaud him for doing the article, but he should step up and admit his faults and CHOOSE to stay away from the children to prove he is really stronger. "

What about the kids? wrote on Mar 28, 2006 11:52 AM:

" I think we have a huge problem in this society in that no one seems to be protecting the children. Mary is so wrong for even thinking of having this man around her children. She is thinking of what she wants and her own convenience, not her kids. The county should not allow it either, but we cannot depend on the government to protect children. Protecting a child begins with the parents. I hear stories all the time about parents allowing their teenage daughters to date older men and I think it is sickening. A fourteen year old should not be allowed to date a nineteen year old period. I don't understand why these parents are not doing more to protect their daughters. Do they honestly think that boy is not trying to have sex with their daughter! Parents, do what's right follow the law and protect your kids. "

read the article wrote on Mar 28, 2006 11:31 AM:

" His origional offense he was just given probation. Did the system fail him? Did he receive treatment. So he offended again and this time he went to prison where he could get help. It doesnt say he reoffended since then. Yes, he violated his rules and was revoked, but do you have any idea how silly of a rule violation they can revoke on? He hasnt reoffended since so why not give him a chance? Or have you never made a mistake in your life? He got help and it appears its working...so if you dont like it...then just stay away and live your own life. "

lynch mob wrote on Mar 28, 2006 11:25 AM:

" I dont know if a sex offender who commits offenses against children can be rehabilitated. I think they learn how to cope with their feelings of inappropriacy, but the thoughts however are likely always there. I do have issues with the registration. I dont think everyone should be required to register. A guy in highschool who is 17 has a girlfriend who is 15 and they have a consensual relationship should not have to register. But what happens is that HIS life is ruined by this registration and he is forever labeled as a pervert. Do you know how many times that happens and the people never get caught? I bet comments from people above have been in situations with girlfriends who were younger than them - the difference is they didnt get prosecuted for it. Did they know the laws? These are kids who dont even know the laws, yet they get forced on this registration requirement. Everyone needs to stop putting sex offenders in a box and labeling them and find out the real story and let people try to live their lives. But Im not saying I think people who commit crimes on children shouldnt be on there, they should. We need to protect our kids. But changes definately need to be made. And why isnt there a database for all felons? Do you realize how many there are that murder and sell drugs to children? And the re-offending rates are higher for them than sex offenders. Why are we just singling out sex offenders? "

To Michael wrote on Mar 28, 2006 7:05 AM:

" Obviously you live in some kind of fantasy world, where no one has ever suffered the shame and fear of a sexual predator. You must just go through your day skipping and singing lalalalala. How did you jump from a child molester to him becoming an american terrorist, would that be a terrorist that bombs buildings and people in Iraq? Wouldn't that person be called a soldier, sailor, marine, etc.? Hopefully you will never have to realize that our justice system can't take away the nightmares, the scars, the fear of intimacy, that stays with a victimized child for the rest of their lives. John will pay his debt, because usually what goes around comes around, sometimes a hundred fold. "

To Gregg wrote on Mar 28, 2006 6:14 AM:

" Lowest recidivism? I don't think so. If that were the case, out of all the registered offenders in the area the best one they could come up with as an example (John) is a REPEAT OFFENDER! The statistics were pitiful examples. The samples were 20 to 1. And oh, by the way, not all children tell, sex offenders get away with their crimes way more than any other criminal, THAT is a fact. If the victim doesn't tell, it must not have happened, is that right? You sure seem to know alot about the rehab program. HMMM "

mother of 2 wrote on Mar 27, 2006 12:37 PM:

" "the people who need to know, know". Are you kidding me??????? EVERYONE with children, nieces, nephews, cousins, grandkids, neighbor kids, etc. needs to know about a predator like you. "

mother of 2 wrote on Mar 27, 2006 12:33 PM:

" Mary, you should not be allowed to have your children. You will be just as guilty as "JOHN" when something happens to one or all of your children. Too bad you put yourself before your children. "

Concerned Parent wrote on Mar 27, 2006 11:24 AM:

" Has he really owned up to his past or the consequences of his "repeated" past. I think that it's the consequesnces, and if he can get away with it without getting caught, I bet he sure will. Sex offenders is the one crime that is almost ALWAYS recommitted by the perp. I think that all child sex offenders should be sentenced to life in prision...LIFE! "

Gregg wrote on Mar 27, 2006 9:39 AM:

" Heather, who said Sex Offenders cannot be rehabilitated? They have one of the lowest recidivist rates of any ex-felons. Those who honestly want to correct themselves, do the behavioral modification program which includes a plan to avoid behaviors which lead to acting out sexually. Most sex offenders do not reoffend once they have gone through the recognized program. This program includes things to keep them from reoffending the rest of their lives. It works similar to other programs - if you want to make it work, it will. "

Heather wrote on Mar 26, 2006 11:41 PM:

" I cannot believe this article!!! It has been proven that sex offenders cannot be rehabilitated, and John is proof of that. Not only did he make the "mistake" one time, he did it twice, or at least he was caught twice. Now, a mother is trusting him to be around her children?!?!? That is one of the worst parenting mistakes I have heard. I pray for your children Mary! "

Laurie wrote on Mar 26, 2006 9:32 PM:

" John you're'trying to be sincere; but being that I was abused as a child, I don't have any positive thoughts for you. You just should stay away from children. Mary I wouldn't even leave the kids alone with him. It would not be a responsible thing to do. "

Are you kidding? wrote on Mar 26, 2006 6:19 PM:

" Let me get this strait, John is a repeat offender of children. "The people that need to know know" This from a man who repeatedly enticed children he didn't even know. THIS is the reason for the sex offender websites. EVERYONE needs to know because NO ONE knows who his next victim will be, not even John. And by the this confirms my fears about the WI court systems, we only pay lip service to the best interest of the child. If we really cared the children wouldn't be with Mary as long as she's with John. Sorry John but you've slipped too many times to risk more children. They shouldn't pay your price, you should. "

? wrote on Mar 26, 2006 6:07 PM:

" if he commits a crime against her kids,can she be charged? "

Leslie wrote on Mar 26, 2006 2:06 PM:

" John, good for you. I hope that all continues to go well for you. You are also very lucky that the courts didn't use the 980 Law with you. Be thankful for what you have and never give up! God Bless you and your loved ones. "

Really Sad wrote on Mar 26, 2006 1:43 PM:

" Am sorry but John your a repeated child sex offender...I do not understand why on earth your probation officer and the law, has allowed you to be around "Mary's" children. I know that you can tell me it started out "supervised" but any of us can "act!" You may be a wonderful person...but you do have a problem. You do deserve love and caring in your life...it just is very hard for my self to think that it is with a woman with 5 children. Might be different if her children were grown up and on their own. But living in the same house is something else again. It is almost like our legal system is saying "Let's give John the bait and see if he takes it." But everyone in this situation is using children...and that is really sad! Not sure what to say "John and Mary" I guess I can not even say "Good luck" and mean it...as I fear Mary or one of her close relatives will be asking the law for our support someday because "John" messed up AGAIN. "

Lisa wrote on Mar 26, 2006 1:41 PM:

" I don't think it should matter what other people think just go on with YOur life just don't listen to them don't let it hurt you just ignore it you can do it i belive in you "

he deserve this 2nd chance wrote on Mar 26, 2006 1:08 PM:

" he own up his past and willing to work hard to improve him self in social. Great Job JOHN keep it up. "

Michael wrote on Mar 26, 2006 12:38 PM:

" Im si glad that John is putting his life togther and people should be supportive of him. We all make mistakes in life and punishment is doled out in the justice system. To continue to deny anyone life and liberty serves no purpose. Would you be happy if he became homeless. unemployed and went off the deep end and became an american terroist. "

July wrote on Mar 26, 2006 12:26 PM:

" I think in cases such as John's he will be tied hard. He is a repeat offender and of children. It is not like he was 19 and she 17 dating and consenting. These are babies that forever will be scared and hurt and god forbide could grow up to be an offender themselves. We have to hold people accountable but we have to know the facts. I feel that there are levels of sexual offenses and that by knowing the crime or the ages and the history with the offender maybe we could make a better decison. A decision on who we have to watch more as opposed to the teenager that had sex with his girlfriend. Who do we look at harder it should be John. I agree with John in that it will not be easy and they should not be looking for it all to happen at once. However again I go back to the history of the offense and the degree. I do not agree that John should be treated the same as the man who had sex with his 17 year old girlfriend and either got caught by parents or the girl got mad about something and wanted pay back. Come on La Crosse it happens to the best of families. Get the facts "

You don't deserve anything wrote on Mar 26, 2006 8:12 AM:

" I can't believe John has a problem with the sex offender registry. John do you ever wonder about the nightmares your victims have? Do you know what you did scarred them for life? Mary, what are you thinking? You might as well offer your children up to the wolves. What about your grandchildren? John will be so tempted when they are little, because no one will ever know, right John? I wish guys like you were branded on the forehead for the world to see what you truly are. "

Just a matter of time wrote on Mar 26, 2006 7:55 AM:

" It's just a matter of time before "John" Gets bored and lonley, depressed, gets a negative attitude, or something goes wrong. He'll be back and his girl will regret it because it will be one of hers or someone close to her. You are in my prayers "John". I pray you do not re-offend. If could suggest one thing. Accept Christ into your heart, ask Him to forgive you, start living for Jesus and you will be saved and your sins will be forgiven. After all, it dies not matter what human forgives you, it's Christ. I forgive you but I still do not trust you. Until you turn your life over to Christ and start living for Him, only than can you be trusted. Blessings to your girlfriend. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
The Chronicle
Holmen Courier
Houston County News
Onalaska Life
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2007 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.