Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Wednesday, May 17, 2006

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (74 comment(s))

Death penalty on Wisconsin's ballot


.
MADISON — Wisconsin voters will be asked during the Nov. 7 general election whether the state should lift its 1853 ban on the death penalty, the longest state ban in the nation.

The Republican-controlled state Senate voted 18-15 on Tuesday after a contentious four-hour debate to set up an advisory referendum to gauge the public’s opinion on administering the penalty for certain convicted killers.
The move adds another emotional issue to an election in which voters will decide whether to re-elect Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle and rewrite the state constitution to ban gay marriage and civil unions.

Tuesday’s action by the Senate puts this question on the ballot: “Should the death penalty be enacted in the state of Wisconsin for cases involving a person who is convicted of first-degree intentional homicide, if the conviction is supported by DNA evidence?”

Death penalty supporters hope the results will encourage the Legislature to enact a law lifting the 153-year-old ban on the practice, the longest ban of all 12 states without the death penalty, as early as next year.

“I am optimistic that a thoughtful and spirited debate on the merits of reinstatement can now take place,” said Sen. Alan Lasee, R-De Pere, who sponsored the resolution. “This debate is what will influence legislators when they return for the 2007 session.”

The prospect for reinstatement will be unlikely as long as Doyle, who opposes the death penalty, wins re-election. But his opponent, U.S. Rep. Mark Green, R-Green Bay, has said he would sign a death penalty bill into law if approved by the Legislature.

Democrats, in heated speeches that dominated the afternoon floor debate, called the referendum a political stunt aimed at driving up turnout among conservative voters. They said they were ashamed Republicans wanted to bring back a policy that could execute wrongly convicted people.

“It’s been 153 years since the government killed a person in the state of Wisconsin,” said Sen. Jon Erpenbach, D-Middleton. “We have functioned as a state without it. We don’t need it.”

Sen. Cathy Stepp, R-Sturtevant, said Tuesday was not the time for debate on the complex social and moral issues raised by capital punishment.

“All we’re trying to do is to give people the opportunity to tell us how they feel,” she said. “Why are we so afraid of finding out what people want?”

The Senate in March adopted a similar plan. The Assembly, in a 47-45 vote earlier this month, changed the date of the referendum to November from the September primary and broadened the question to apply to all first-degree murderers instead of “vicious” homicides.

The Senate’s 18-15 vote on Tuesday adopted those changes. Senators voted to reject Democratic amendments that would have changed the referendum date back to September and made clear the death penalty would apply only to adults.

Two Republicans — Sens. Mary Lazich of New Berlin and Glenn Grothman of West Bend — joined 13 Democrats in opposition to the Assembly changes. One Democrat, Roger Breske of Eland, voted with the remaining 17 Republicans in favor.

Lawmakers banned the death penalty five years after Wisconsin became a state in reaction to the grisly public hanging in Kenosha of a man who had drowned his wife. Repeated attempts to bring back the penalty have failed. Life in prison without parole is the stiffest penalty available.

Democrats said the referendum was a waste of time because polls show the death penalty is popular among the state and the issue would get lost amid the other ballot questions in November.

But Lasee, who has worked to reinstate the death penalty for 30 years, said the referendum could build public support for his goal. He said the referendum is the only way to push the issue because Doyle’s veto pen stands in the way of any bill. The referendum did not need approval from the governor.
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

mr magee wrote on Nov 5, 2006 8:27 PM:

" got any sand or rock salt in there i need to get some traction "

r wrote on May 24, 2006 11:33 PM:

" How many Abortions are we up to now in this country. Is it not a death. "

WI Guy wrote on May 22, 2006 2:39 PM:

" Min Guy, well spoken for someone from a state who elected a "pro wrestler" as govner...grin... "

Patriot wrote on May 22, 2006 2:10 PM:

" Seems like conservatives have an easily solution to every problem. If you don't like it shoot it. Shoot immigrants with the army. Shoot Iraqis. Shoot Afghanis. And shoot criminals. If you don't shoot 'em, at least you can pack some heat. Time for Wisconsin to visit the 21st century and all the bad boys to put away their guns. "

cryptoman wrote on May 22, 2006 9:40 AM:

" I would take the worst "scum balls" & load em up & dump em in Iraq...or Cuba if you want to cut down on the cost........ "

stop and think about it wrote on May 22, 2006 8:15 AM:

" i just have to say stop and think about it..if someone raped and brutally murdered your child, what judgement would you want..the death penalty or pay for him to be in prison for the rest of his life.I as a parent would want him to take the chair. "

MN GUY wrote on May 22, 2006 8:05 AM:

" Vote in the death penalty after more than 100 years and complete Wisconsin's image of a place with a widespread drinking problem, crooked state goverment,high taxes, unhealthy people and now those who want to kill people even though it is proven that mistakes are made. GROW UP WISCONSIN! "

George wrote on May 22, 2006 7:45 AM:

" Not much dif than being a soldier. get paid to kill the bad guys n gals. "

George wrote on May 22, 2006 7:42 AM:

" to mickey...Hey, work is work. Not kidding here and not sick either. "

Let Them Fry is a Troll wrote on May 21, 2006 8:06 PM:

" Every newsgroup or bulletin board has them. They generally post outrageous things just to get other posters worked up and to get a rise out of them. Usually it works and people are reminded not to 'feed the trolls', meaning not to respond to their nonsense because they just want attention. A Troll is considered to be a low life on the net. "

To "Let them fry" wrote on May 21, 2006 5:45 PM:

" You are one sick ticket. I wonder if you were the type of kid that pulled the wings off flies. "

Mikey wrote on May 21, 2006 3:33 PM:

" to george and fry: OK, now you are just trying to be funny. HA HA. Or else you are really sick. Have you considered getting counciling? "

Hmm wrote on May 21, 2006 2:54 PM:

" to good and informative. iwould think that doing a week in max security would be easier than doing in the gen prison popiulation? just a guess.... "

George wrote on May 21, 2006 11:46 AM:

" Support the Death Penalty. Not as a deterant but as a preventative measure. Once wasted, no more harm caused by that one at least. Put the best processes in place to ensure that only guilty fit the bill. I once thought the executioner of Texas would be a good job. You don't work to often and the work isn't that hard or dificult but at least its steady. "

Let them fry wrote on May 21, 2006 10:39 AM:

" Being the executioner is my dream. I'd have no problem pulling the switch, I'd be laughing as I did it. I could also send some pics from work for Mr Sena to enjoy. "

Mr. Sena wrote on May 21, 2006 12:07 AM:

" If the State reserves the right to kill its citizens, then those citizens should be afraid....VERY afraid. "

Good and informative posts, Mikey. wrote on May 20, 2006 11:23 PM:

" Unfortunately, there are too many who are clueless as to what the Constitution and the Bill of Rights actually say. They could care less if capital punishment costs more than life in prison without parole, but they squeal like stuck pigs if any of their taxes go up. They come on all self righteous with their chest beating and cries for blood and vengeance. That an innocent person might be executed never seems to cross their minds. They seem to think that prison is just one long good time, but not one of them would survive a week in a maximum security prison. "

Mr. Sena wrote on May 20, 2006 3:20 PM:

" To the person named, "To FMS WOW.....", you sent your application? Why should anyone here believe you? To whom did you send it? To what office? Give us a name. (I hope you fixed your bad spelling and grammar.) I am LAUGHING at your false claim. "

Mikey wrote on May 20, 2006 2:54 PM:

" One other thing re the death penalty issue. It is all a ruse to get out the conservative vote in November. Cynical politicos are counting on you to show up and vote them in while you return barbarism to the state of WI with the unnecessary and expensive establishment of a new death row. I think they miscalculated and I hope Mr Kapanke gets to go home to watch baseball after next fall's vote. "

Mikey wrote on May 20, 2006 2:50 PM:

" One other thing re the death penalty. Wisconsin is the 9th safest state in the union. Those safer than Wisconsin are Iowa, West Virginia, Maine, Vermont, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, and New Hampshire. Of those safer than Wisconsin, only South Dakota, Wyoming, and New Hampshire have the death penalty. One wonders why. Wisconsin has moved from 11th safest in 2003 to 10 safest in 2004, to 9th safest in the latest statistics. Without the death penalty. Seems to me your odds of being safe go with NOT having the death penalty. Texas executes so many that we almost lose count (755 since 1976) and yet it is ranked 40th in safety. Go figger. "

Mikey wrote on May 20, 2006 2:38 PM:

" Dear Sparky and All you need is a bullet: I suggest you read that short little thing that defines America called the Bill of Rights. The Eighth Amendement explicitly forbids inflicting "cruel and unusual punishments". Many read that to mean your proposed ways of executing someone would be a violation of ANYONE's fundamental rights. Others suggest taht in this day and age it should forbid any death penalty. (By the way: the sterile needle and the alcohol wipe down prior to lethal injection are for the safety of the executioner, not the convict.) "

Re: To Mr. Sena wrote on May 20, 2006 12:40 PM:

" How about when you pull the switch on an innocent person? Is it, too bad, so sad--kill 'em all and let God sort them out? That is a simple, specific, and major problem with capital punishment for which none of its supporters seem to have an acceptable answer. When the state executes an innocent person, the state has committed murder. There is no other way around it. "

To Mr Sena wrote on May 20, 2006 11:12 AM:

" No problem, apps in the mail. See I show no emotions against a convict in being punished for there act against man kind and I will let GOD decide there outcome. You have a safe day. "

Mr. Sena wrote on May 20, 2006 9:47 AM:

" To the person named, "To FMS WOW.....", I am awed by your brave words. Now, back them up. If you have no problem will personally executing prisoners, then GO APPLY FOR THE JOB. You speak so bravely from the safety of your home. I am LAUGHING at your tough talk. After you get the job and have a few executions under your belt, then come back and tell how you're doing. "

To FMS WOW..... wrote on May 20, 2006 9:02 AM:

" Where did you come from ?? That is like the 60's thinking man. But let me get back to the subject, the reason it cost so much is the fibrilous lawsuits these convicts get. They sue because they don't get cable or they can't have there favorite food every day that is why it cost so much to put them to death. Don't get me started with the lawyers they suck every penny out of the system they can get. If we could put them in a cell and throw away the key I'm for that also. TO Mr. SENA I will pull the switch every time no questions asked and it won't cost a dime. "

To Nonviolence: wrote on May 20, 2006 8:47 AM:

" No one here opposed to the death penalty is suggesting that the loss you describe is not horrific, but how would killing the killer change anything? How is death by lethal injection worse punishment than a meaningless "life" locked in an 8 x 10 cell 20+ hours a day? THAT is punishment, not a life lived. Any psychologist and any victim who has seen it through to an execution will tell you that the death of the killer is not enough and the pain is still there. And execution certainly does not deter other would be killers from killing. "

FMS wrote on May 20, 2006 2:12 AM:

" One of the commandments of God is " Thou shalt not Kill!!!They already served their sentence, thats enough already...Be humane because all the person in the death sentence has a family too so try to be humane...Show love also to them because we are here because of LOVE.... "

No to expanding governmental power wrote on May 19, 2006 7:46 PM:

" The government should never have the power to deliberately take somone's life. Taking someone's liberty and property is awesome enough. As for DNA, the science may be bulletproof, but the process of collecting, securing, handling and reporting any evidence is always subject to the fallabilities of humans. "

Next thing you know... wrote on May 19, 2006 4:30 PM:

" ...Those against the death penalty, will suggest we let the prisoners pick their own punishment. "

Bring back Old Sparky wrote on May 19, 2006 2:42 PM:

" We should use the old electric chair that use to be in Florida. It would set people on fire as they were strapped in the chair. That is true punishment that the murderer deserves. "

RE: Nonviolence!! wrote on May 19, 2006 1:41 PM:

" So after looking at the posting one states cost for the death penalty you don't want to keep them in jail for life but you are wiling to spend many times at much to put them to death? "

Mr. Sena wrote on May 19, 2006 12:58 PM:

" To "Nonviolence!!", I would argue that executing the prisoner will never bring your child back. It will never take away the pain and horror. As a parent, you will be forever stained with the agony of losing your child, and you will have to deal with it. That one minute of satisfaction (seeing the prisoner executed) will never take away your pain. Our judicial system must base itself on reason and logic, and not on emotions. If it were to base itself on emotions, then we would have daily lynchings. Do we really want that to happen?? "

Re: Eye for Eye wrote on May 19, 2006 9:55 AM:

" I'm glad someone pointed out that "eye for eye" shouldn't be interpreted literally, but that's what most people wind up doing when they quote it. Many of these laws/guidelines were like ancient insurance--the wrongdoer typically had to pay a sum of money for causing harm to another person or property. They didn't go around removing peoples' eyes for retribution. "

Eye for an eye wrote on May 19, 2006 8:19 AM:

" I believe in the "an eye for an eye" system. In the case of capital murder, with DNA evidence, a death sentence is the only option. Thanks to Dan Kapanke to putting this on the ballot. I participated in the Trib poll on this subject, and although I didn't see the final numbers, support for the death sentence at that point was resounding. There will never be a deterrent for murder, I don't believe that people willing to commit that crime actually have the thought process to contemplate the possibility of punishment. I wonder what the resluts would be if you were to poll the victims of past murders. Then you might get results worth talking about. "

Nonviolence!! wrote on May 19, 2006 6:40 AM:

" What do you do with a person who brutally rapes and murders your child? DNA proved.He goes to prison to watch televison, work out in his fitness center, eat hot meals, get paid to work in prison, read books, take college classes if they want and I have to help pay for all of this for the rest of their life, while my child is dead,dead,dead. What is the justice for this crime then? You tell me to forgive, ok, but forget, NEVER. "

Amen Fr. Bob! wrote on May 18, 2006 9:29 PM:

" That is exactly right, but the buffet style Christians don't get that. They love to dip back into the Old Testament to pick out the bits they like and disregard the others since "we are not under the law". They are pretty much that way in the New Testament too because they really don't like the Sermon on the Mount. An "eye for an eye" was meant to stop the blood feuds where the avenge killing never ends because there is always one more person's killing to avenge. "

Re: Re: One States Costs wrote on May 18, 2006 6:36 PM:

" If my posting the on state's cost sways some voters by like Boingo then maybe the eye-for-an-eye crowd will be defeated. If anyone Googles "death penalty costs" and see for themselves the costs for listed for different state's maybe they will stop to think of how much Wisconsin will need to raise their taxes to satisfy their desire to kill a killer. "

Fr. Bob wrote on May 18, 2006 5:46 PM:

" "Eye for an eye" (Ex 21,24 and parallels) was intended to LIMIT and avoid escalation of violence as exhibited by Lamec's 77 to 1 boast (Gn 4,23-24). Defending the Death Penalty from Scripture is a form of taking God's name in vain. Killing criminals only "justifies" killing, perpetuating the criminal mentality of solving problems with violence. Though an evil criminal may "deserve" death, we degrade and punish ourselves by executing them. "

34 year old male wrote on May 18, 2006 5:13 PM:

" I am against the death penalty. Of course, my judgement might be swayed if my family were brutally murdered -- but then I'd expect the court system and sensible people to deliver justice, precisely because my judgement would be affected. A key point of our judicial system is that people not involved in the events decide what's right. Killing another person is not right. Nor is it right to lay the responsibility for meting out death upon our citizen juries and judges. "

Boingo wrote on May 18, 2006 4:41 PM:

" Yeah I was all gung ho about the death penalty too until seeing the price of putting someone down. I dont want my tax dollars working to let a convict play his little appeal game over decades. If DNA proof would allow a small bullet to end it, I would be all for it, but it never will. Vote it down in November... "

Re: One States Costs wrote on May 18, 2006 3:24 PM:

" To those who support the death penalty it is not about money because they would gladly pay a billion dollars a year to execute convicted crimininals. These same people would choke if it came to paying more money for education or social programs. No, it's not about money--it's a bloodlust for revenge and retribution. It cannot be proven that capital punishment deters crime, it can only kill the person convicted of the crime so they will never kill again. No matter that it would be cheaper to keep the person in prison for the rest of their life where they would also not have an opportunity to kill again. So an argument about the cost of executions will never sway the supporters of capital punishment because they demand a death for a death at any cost. "

Mr. Sena wrote on May 18, 2006 3:14 PM:

" I laugh at those who sit bravely at their computers or in their easy chairs and self-righteously call for the execution of prisoners. It's oh so easy to scream for someone's head when you don't have to do the beheading. I challenge anyone who loves to call for executions to go volunteer for the job. GO APPLY FOR THE JOB. See how well you do when your hand is on the switch and the prisoner (who may or may NOT be guilty) is looking directly at you. "

J.R. wrote on May 18, 2006 2:46 PM:

" As long as someone is sitting in Prison, there is the chance for an incorrect "guilty" verdict to be reversed. Under no circumstances regardless of DNA evidence (which can be planted, and we know there are crooked cops out there) can we EVER be 100% sure of someone's guilt. For that reason alone the ultimate punishment of death should be left to God alone to hand out. As far as all of you "eye for an eye" people are concerned, I consider myself to be ABOVE the common criminal or murderer because I chose NOT to behave as they do. Copying their crime as punishment simply seats you squarely in their company. "

One States Costs wrote on May 18, 2006 2:08 PM:

" The California death penalty system costs taxpayers more than $114 million a year beyond the cost of simply keeping the convicts locked up for life. (This figure does not take into account additional court costs for post-conviction hearings in state and federal courts, estimated to exceed several million dollars.) With 11 executions spread over 27 years, on a per execution basis, California and federal taxpayers have paid more than $250 million for each execution. It costs approximately $90,000 more a year to house an inmate on death row, than in the general prison population or $57.5 million annually. The Attorney General devotes about 15% of his budget, or $11 million annually to death penalty cases. "

Capital Punishment in Wisconsin is long overdue!!! wrote on May 18, 2006 11:20 AM:

" Bring back the death penalty in Wisconsin!!! In recent years we have had murders in Wisconsin that scream out for capital punishment. 41 of the 50 states have the death penalty. Let's be the 42nd state to pass the bill!!!!! "

Re: Wrongfully Convicted wrote on May 18, 2006 10:35 AM:

" In a perfect world, nobody would be wrongfully convicted, but in a perfect world there would also probably be no crime. The prosecution's job is to prove the charged person's guilt and that person is innocent until proven guilty. If there is reasonable doubt, then a judge or jury should find the person "not guilty". Sometimes the crime is so heinous that it fans the flames of vengeance and retribution so that the public, and sometimes a judge and jury, are blinded to reasonable doubt. But we cannot pass off the blame because when the state executes an innocent person, then it is done in our name also and we also bear part of the responsibility if we support the death penalty. "

Wrongfully Convicted wrote on May 18, 2006 8:47 AM:

" Maybe, if those doing the job of gathering evidence,and those having to prove the results would do their jobs better, the would be no wrongful convictions. Don't go to trial,until the proof is positive. "

Re: To those who gleefully support the death penalty wrote on May 17, 2006 10:18 PM:

" The referendum states that the death penalty will only be considered for somewone convicted of 1st degree murder that also has dna evidence. So the margin for error is small. Why are we always so eager to console the perpetrators and give them the benefit of the doubt, while the families of the victims don't get to see proper justice. "

No Capital Punishment! wrote on May 17, 2006 8:52 PM:

" The statistics of ANY State with the death penalty will show you that putting someone on death row WILL ALWAYS cost the tax payers more than putting them away for life. I always say, "Put them away for life, make them live through their punishment! Death is the easy way out for them." If they really and truly deserve to die for their crimes, such as Dahmer did the prisoners will take care of it for us...free of charge! "

To those who gleefully support the death penalty: wrote on May 17, 2006 7:49 PM:

" I hope you display equal zeal when the state has to admit that it made a mistake and executed an innocent person. I am sure your lust for vengeance will be of great comfort to that person's family. "

Why not? wrote on May 17, 2006 7:06 PM:

" If some one kills without anythought for the victims why not give them a proper punishment. They voluntarily decided there life is over, it's cruel and unusual punishment to lock someone away to just wait to die. Maybe we'll be doing them a favor. Putting them away to lift weights and live on my tax dollars is hardly a just punishment. If they do the crime let them reap what they sowed. "

Darral wrote on May 17, 2006 5:40 PM:

" If the city would need an exeucutioner I'd be more than willing to volunteer my time. I'd even bring my own black hood! "

Tim pb wrote on May 17, 2006 4:55 PM:

" I Am for the death penalty for the worst crimes such as intentional murder because one is responsible for one's own actions whatever they maybe. One's own actions,in this case, are never to be taken lighly and one is accountable for them. "

Costs too much, make it cheaper. wrote on May 17, 2006 4:31 PM:

" I am for capital punishment and all these people say it costs more. Well the only reason that it costs more is because of all the appeals that have no merit to them. My proposal: If there is DNA evidence the convict has 5 years to complete a maximum of 2 appeals. If not overturned they die on the 5 year anniversary of sentencing. "

What about those wrongfully convicted? wrote on May 17, 2006 3:45 PM:

" My main concern is the risk of innocent people being convicted and sentenced to death. Some of the people convicted of murder deserve to die, especially those who prey on children, but the risk that an innocent person might get the blame isn't worth it. I won't go as far as the person who said to turn the other cheek--if someone is going to murder me or my family, I'm going to fight them and kill them if necessary. "Turn the other cheek" certainly has the right to let him/herself be killed. If their cheek is turned, at least they won't see it coming. "

R A wrote on May 17, 2006 2:33 PM:

" I am for it, and it shouldn't take so long, the waiting has to be very stressful. An eye for an eye, plain and simple! "

sue wrote on May 17, 2006 1:36 PM:

" Plain and simple "Thou shall not kill." "

TO:JESUS WEPT wrote on May 17, 2006 1:02 PM:

" Maybe he should of given us more cheeks. In this day and age,"4 CHEEKS" are just not enough! "

Jesus Wept. wrote on May 17, 2006 12:47 PM:

" I'm against all killing, there is no reason to have it. No abortions, no capital punishment, no wars. Remember Jesus turned the other cheek. For those for capital punishment, you must look at yourself and question why you feel the need for it. It's sick and barbaric. "

The Observer wrote on May 17, 2006 12:37 PM:

" Rahim: "The death penalty is a vestige of barbarism." Ok ok. And first-degree intentional homicide is just a triviality. Ok ok. The milder penalties, the less barbarism, not? "

Former WI Resident wrote on May 17, 2006 12:31 PM:

" I'd like to know the real costs of executing a criminal verses locking one up for 40 years. From what I've read, it is significantly cheaper to just lock the door for 23 hours / day for 40 years. The Death Penalty is designed By and For the Profit of Lawyers. Do they really need any more of our Tax Payer Dollars? It's bad enough that our Legal System is designed by and for the Profit of Lawyers. We have long since lost the idea of a Justice System. The Guilty and Rich get off, but the middle class and poor sit in prison. A very sad state of affairs. "

Recovering Reaganista wrote on May 17, 2006 12:18 PM:

" Ah, yes, let's just assume that everyone who opposes the death penalty is a hippie--just like that leftist Pope Benedict, hey? "

Get the facts wrote on May 17, 2006 11:13 AM:

" I know it is had for the citizens of La Crosse to get the facts before they start stating their opinions but the bill does say that the death penalty can only be used for someone found guilty and that there also is DNA evidence that collaborates the verdict. "

To all hippies wrote on May 17, 2006 10:21 AM:

" Yes yes yes. Bring back the chair. Yes yes yes. "

Recovering Reaganista wrote on May 17, 2006 9:39 AM:

" I'm growing more embarrased by the day that I ever considered myself a Republican. The GOP (and their Fox News parrots) keep repeating the mantra that the Democrats have no new ideas. Funny, though, how the GOP pushes for inflammatory issues like gay marriage, concealed carry, etc. on the ballots. It doesn't take much to see that the proverbial Emperor is looking pretty darned naked. (Read: Why haven't we caught Osama by now?) What remains to be seen is whether anyone in the moderate wing of the GOP will have the cajones to come out and say it. "

ANY EXCUSE wrote on May 17, 2006 9:10 AM:

" Our courts dictates the evidence in processing a suspect, the jury decision is based on the evidence and the verdict given. We have evidence that is not presented for one reason or another by the courts during the trial which changes the verdict but no one complains about this. We make mistakes, but the verdict is passed on the information that is provided us. This is our court system right or wrong. Death penalty should be reinstated and used. "

NO? wrote on May 17, 2006 8:50 AM:

" Why not? Suggestion- why not,use the prisoners as guinea pigs,for new drugs and disease studies? At least that way,putting them in prison would have somewhat of good from bad scenario,and the human body makes more sense than a lab rat.(as far as dosage and make-up). "

sad wrote on May 17, 2006 8:47 AM:

" It is sad for Wisconsin that this is on the ballot. "

Our peers wrote on May 17, 2006 8:34 AM:

" China, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria.....these are the Nation's we emulate when the State murders.....great company, eh? "

Dan Kapanke Should Lose His Job wrote on May 17, 2006 8:29 AM:

" His constituents do not support the death penalty. The death penalty does not provide general deterrence. The death penalty is applied primarily to the poor, sick, and minorities. The death penalty is not utilized by any civilized country. The death penalty is a vestige of a bygone era. The death penalty is expensive and will further clog our court system. Please remember this when Mr. Kapanke runs for reelection. "

Sandra Johnson wrote on May 17, 2006 7:43 AM:

" The death penalty is wrong on a moral, social, and financial level. How many times have they thought there was DNA evidence to later find out that there was some error. It is costly to maintain a death penalty and the last time, I did any research into statistics, it was not a deterrent to murder in any of the states that had it. Where has our humanity gone to even consider reestablising this barberic ritual? "

all you need is a bullet wrote on May 17, 2006 5:59 AM:

" There is one thing I don't understand about the death penalty. Why do they use sterile needles? The person is going to die anyway. I think that the convicted inmate should die the way that they murdered. If they murdered someone using a gun, let's just use one bullet. Surely a bullet is cheaper than lethal injection! "

abdul rahim wrote on May 17, 2006 5:08 AM:

" The death penalty is a vestige of barbarism. "

Nonviolence is the way wrote on May 17, 2006 12:14 AM:

" No no no. No capital punishment. No no no. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
The Chronicle
Holmen Courier
Houston County News
Onalaska Life
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.