Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Friday, August 18, 2006

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (3 comment(s))

UW-L growth plan clears hurdle


.
MADISON — A proposal by the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse to increase enrollment and manage its own tuition got its first green light Thursday.

UW-L’s growth and access plan — which would increase enrollment by 1,000 students during the next decade and set higher tuition than most other UW campuses — was part of the $4.315 billion 2007-09 biennial budget request the Board of Regents approved by a 15-2 vote.
Excluding UW-L, the regents have recommended a tuition increase of 3 percent in 2007-08 and 1.96 percent in 2008-09, although those rates will not be officially set until the summer before each academic year. The system also requested at least an additional $140 million in state dollars, on top of the nearly $2 billion it received this biennium.

While the budget request and UW-L’s plan still need approval from the Legislature and governor, proponents of the plan were pleased with Thursday’s vote.

“We’re not done yet,” Interim Chancellor Elizabeth Hitch said after the vote. “But we made an important first hurdle.“

UW-L’s growth plan was among the 17 growth plans recommended by regents as ways to increase access and affordability to UW schools. Unlike most of those plans, UW-L’s does not ask for additional state taxpayer dollars.

It does count on the money the state already provides —about $35 million in 2005-06 — and any continuing costs, as well as other systemwide initiatives included in the budget proposal.

If it gets all the needed approval, UW-L’s plan would be a pilot program for 10 years. It asks Regents to increase in-state student tuition by about $1,300 over three years — or $440 a year — under the plan. Nonresident tuition would decrease by about $3,000.

Full-time student enrollment would increase to about 9,600. About $15 million would be generated from the plan, with $4 million going for financial aid. The rest would be used to hire about 130 more faculty and staff.

A proposed motion would have increased the amount of money going toward financial aid to 50 percent, but it failed by a 5-12 vote.

Having flexibility as the program matures will be essential in making sure students thrive once on campus, Ron Lostetter, UW-L’s vice chancellor of administration and finance told 17 regents. And student success is dependent on having the faculty and staff needed to support them, he said.

“Just bringing students to campus is not a measure of success,” Lostetter added.

Regent Gerard Randall, of Milwaukee, voted against the budget as a whole because he objected to UW-L’s proposal. He thinks it will not attract the demographic of students UW-L is seeking.

“I find it a model that is not going to bear the fruit they think it is going to bear,” he said.

Hitch has said the program would allow the campus to increase the number of degrees awarded each year, provide a more diverse campus and increase financial aid for students from low-income families.

The other nay vote, student Regent Christopher M. Semenas from UW-Parkside, voted against the budget package because he opposed the tuition increases. At least 20 UW students attended Thursday’s meeting, holding up signs that asked for a tuition freeze.

Ryan VanLoo, president of the UW-L student association, said it was a tough call to support the proposal, as he would prefer the state fully-fund the UW System.

But he knows that is unlikely and with this idea, students know what their money is going toward.

“We want UW-L to go forward, not maintain the status quo,” he said. “We’re growing with this initiative.”

Kate Schott can be reached at kate.schott@lacrossetribune.com or (608) 791-8226.
.




 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Middle Class Pays Again wrote on Aug 18, 2006 9:54 PM:

" I'm not at ALL happy with this development. Once again the money will come from the pockets of middle class college families who have already had many tuition increases in the past few years. How nice that the proponents of this plan were pleased with the vote. They won't have to pay for any of this expense. How will this proposal benefit current Wisconsin students who have chosen UW-L ? It won't. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel had this UW-L story as it's front page headline today : "Regents OK Tuition Raise For Diversity" It's another interesting article and look at this issue. "

Nestor wrote on Aug 18, 2006 2:05 PM:

" That last post went so well. A VERY different direction in by UWL by looking toward the private sector to pick up a hefty increase in student population. Rather than Gov owned student housing. Now lets have the courage to ask a question. Does it bother anybody that our local UWL Regents represenative is friends still and was related to, and still remains friends. A development company that possibly has student housing projects on or near three other campuses in WI? Especially after this developer was shot out of the saddle recently in a publicized/debated housing project in Lacrosse? Does it bother me? Yeah at first glance. More if the developer has these other on or near campus projects. Then it is far too close of a relationship. Lets ask a fair question for everyones consumption. "

Nestor wrote on Aug 18, 2006 11:51 AM:

" Lets try again. Lowering the tuition for out of state students and raising the tuition for WI students. Tearing down housing to make room for more classrooms, faculty, and staff. To raise 15 million per year while 74% will go for faculty and staff and 24% will go to in my opinion to susidize mostly out of state cash cows, as we put put the need for increased housing responsiblity on privateers waiting in the wings with property that will just fit this bill?? I hope that is OK to post? "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.