To Kind's fundraising wrote on Oct 16, 2006 9:24 PM:
" Where EXACTLY did you read that about Kind's fundraising huh? I bet your not going to tell us are you? And, yes it is in the State of Wisconsin. Why won't Green answer? I'm waiting for his answer and then you'll see mine! "
Mikey wrote on Oct 16, 2006 7:56 PM:
" In my first post I inadvertently left off the quotes on the last sentence. That sentence is from the NIH. "
Reality wrote on Oct 16, 2006 1:56 PM:
" Tell me where in the Constitution it says that the federal government has the right to use our tax dollars to study masturbation of senior citizens? I don't care which party the politicians are in, if they voted for this bilge then they deserve to lose their job. "
Kind spins, and spins, and spins wrote on Oct 16, 2006 1:00 PM:
" We've been STUCK with Kind for too long, time to head in a different direction. "
Mikey again again wrote on Oct 16, 2006 12:43 PM:
" The NIH awarded a grant to study masturbation in senior men as part of an overall effort to understand the significant increase in HIV in elederly heterosexual men. Get real. Kind did not pay people to masturbate. He voted to fund NIH. So did lots of Republicans, who control the congress and the White House. Last time I looked NIH was still in business. "
I was shocked! wrote on Oct 16, 2006 12:11 PM:
" This lady sure gets shocked often, "
Come on Margaret wrote on Oct 16, 2006 12:11 PM:
" Ron's moral compass points directly to getting Ron re-elected PERIOD. As far as good ethical man, I could tell you some stories that I personally experienced with Ron that you would probably tell me were a lie too. Or maybe I just misunderstood? "
Michael Welch: "Shocked!" (YAWN!) "I'm Uh Shocked!"... wrote on Oct 16, 2006 11:50 AM:
" 'Shocked! I'm shocked!' Well, about as 'shocked!' as Claude Rains is to discover gambling at 'Rick's' in the film 'Casablanca.' Ron Kind is just another 'Howdy Doody-looking vontz' running for his pension plus a post-congressional career as yet another well-paid Wash city lobbyist -- in other words he's only the typical political careerist. Nelson however is the typical religious-right-wingy-wars-are-great! (gays are not! uh 'cept for Repub ones maybe huh?) GOPper candydandydate rallying the slathered O'Reillyed and Coultered to the last stand at the Wisconsin river. Dirt?! Fling it high, wide though not so 'handsome' eh?... "
Dean wrote on Oct 16, 2006 11:01 AM:
" The GOP is about winning elections the list goeson/Foti/Abramoff/DeLay/Ney/Watergate/IRAN-CONTRA),Wire taps/Mission accomplished/Gukert Gannon. If the GOP focused on winning wars Viet-Nan and Iraq They could be in the winning column "
Kind's Fundraisng wrote on Oct 16, 2006 9:35 AM:
" I read a report that Kind received a very large sum of money from a local construction corporation. Isn't it illegal to accept money from corporations in Wisconsin? "
Reality wrote on Oct 16, 2006 9:32 AM:
" '[Ron Kind's] values truly reflect those of western Wisconsin' Really?! He voted to kill a baby that was partially born. He voted in favor of spending OUR money to study the masturbation of senior citizens. You think those are Western Wisconsins values? The 3rd District Democrats are more out of touch than I thought. "
To: Patriot2 wrote on Oct 16, 2006 8:07 AM:
" What about William Jefferson, DEMOCRATIC Congressman, Louisiana? Is the bribery money still cold in his freezer? Is ANYONE going to look into the shady land deals of Harry Reid, DEMOCRATIC U.S. Senator, Nevada? NOPE. The LIBERAL media pays no attention to DEMOCRATIC misfits. I agree. Mark Foley is a worthless piece of crap. But Jefferson and Reid are STILL prominent members of Congress. Why is that? Can ANYONE answer that? What haven't Jefferson and Reid resigned? - Local Observer "
Mikey again wrote on Oct 16, 2006 7:49 AM:
" By the way, Nelson's ad is exactly the same as the ad that ran last month in which North Carolina's Vernon Robinson attacked Rep. Brad Miller. Guess which is the Republican. The ad is plagiarized. This is exactly the kind of leadership we can expect from Paul Nelson. HAH! "
Mikey wrote on Oct 16, 2006 7:48 AM:
" I watched the ad online. It is TRUE!!!! Ron Kind voted for SEX!!!! Well, sort of. Oh, and so did lots of Republicans. Actually the vote was for funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which happened to award some grants to scientists researching problems like disease in prostitutes and other perverted liberal things. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is committed to supporting research that will increase scientific understanding of the health status of various population groups and lead to more effective health interventions and services for individuals within those groups. "
Shame on you Paul Nelson wrote on Oct 16, 2006 7:04 AM:
" Have you ever tried to solicit money from corporations is Wisconsin? "
Local Observer wrote on Oct 16, 2006 5:49 AM:
" I have one problem with your rant, Ms. Baecker. What Mr. Nelson is claiming about Ron Kind IS TRUE! Does the truth hurt? If the truth DOES hurt, maybe it's time for Mr. Kind to be replaced. Mr. Nelson's ad was NOT false. The only thing false here is your blind trust in your LIBERAL Congressman. I'm voting for Paul Nelson. "
Patriot2 wrote on Oct 16, 2006 5:40 AM:
" Don't waste your time Margaret. Paul Nelson knows no shame. But La Crosse residents know Ron Kind and don't buy into this filth. La Crosse residents aren't ready to replace a DEMOCRAT with a REPUBLICAN when the REPUBLICAN PARTY is rotting at its core. Dragging us into a WAR on false pretenses and Americans are dying and losing limbs for nothing. NOTHING. COVERING UP the tracks of a sexual predator like MARK FOLEY. Attempting to destroy our nation with massive DEFICITS for our granchildren....but that's ok we have lower taxes.... The party that APPROVES TORTURE.....APPROVES wiretapping without warrants.....the party that TRASHES the ÇONSTITUTION.....oh but that's ok they bash gays so they are the good guys! "
Matt wrote on Oct 16, 2006 3:19 AM:
" Your the chairwoman of the 3rd Congressional District Democratic Party and shocked by dirty politics? It comes from both sides, so you better get over it or resign. "
Shame on you, Ron Kind wrote on Oct 16, 2006 12:20 AM:
" for suggesting we taxpayers foot the bill for a new welfare program. Shame on you, Margaret Baecker for another "PUSH POLE." "
Here Here Margaret wrote on Oct 15, 2006 11:01 PM:
" Way to go Margaret! As if his henchmen weren't doing enough dirty work doring the Maple Leaf Parade now he tries to slander an honest candidate. He is a perfect example of what makes campaigning so sickning "
Advertisement
