Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > Packers > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Friday, January 05, 2007

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (43 comment(s))

McCarthy says Green Bay needs more playmakers


.
GREEN BAY — As wonderful as the Green Bay Packers feel about their four-game winning streak to end the season and the momentum they believe they’ll carry into 2007, coach Mike McCarthy and general manager Ted Thompson didn’t disagree Wednesday that their team could use a few more playmakers.

“I think you’re always looking for playmakers. I don’t think you can ever just say, ‘We have enough playmakers,’” McCarthy said during his end-of-the-season news conference. “Anytime you have a chance to add a playmaker — or just a good football player — to your football team, you have to look into that. And that will always be the case here.
“We’ll always try to upgrade our playmaking ability.”

After focusing on repairing the offensive line in the draft (second-rounder Daryn Colledge, third-rounder Jason Spitz and fifth-rounder Tony Moll each started at least 10 games) and augmenting the defense with both free agency (cornerback Charles Woodson, nose tackle Ryan Pickett and safety Marquand Manuel) and their first-round pick (A.J. Hawk), adding an electrifying offensive player or two would certainly help the Packers (8-8) take another step next year.

Statistically, while the Packers’ offense ranked ninth in the 32-team NFL in yards per game (341.1), it ranked tied for 22nd in points per game (18.8) and 31st in red-zone efficiency (16 TDs in 49 opportunities for a 32.7 percent success rate; only Oakland was worse).

“You can point to red-zone production as a need, but there’s other factors involved in that, too,” McCarthy said.

Perhaps, but it could be argued that the Packers had more playmakers on defense, which scored four touchdowns, than on offense. Defensive end Aaron Kampman had 151/2sacks, Woodson picked off eight passes, and the rapidly improving linebacking corps of Hawk, Nick Barnett and Brady Poppinga chipped in 141/2 “impact plays” — 601/2 sacks, five interceptions and three forced fumbles.

Meanwhile, quarterback Brett Favre, in his 15th season as the team’s starter, essentially had one go-to guy: Two-time Pro Bowl wide receiver Donald Driver, who set career highs in catches (92) and receiving yards (1,295) and with eight touchdowns, accounted for almost 30 percent of the team’s 27 offensive touchdowns.

Green Bay could be in the market for a new featured back if free-agent-to-be Ahman Green (1,059 yards and five rushing TDs on 266 attempts) signs elsewhere, or the club decides not to re-sign him because he’ll turn 30 in February. While backups Vernand Morency or Noah Herron are capable fill-ins, it’s hard to imagine either player carrying the ball 20 to 25 times a game next season.

Asked how confident he is that Green will defy the NFL trend of thirty-something running backs declining rapidly, McCarthy said, “I think he gave us all confidence just with the way he did come back. Just with the way he came back from (a ruptured quadriceps tendon), just the way he continued to get stronger as the season went on. I think you have a lot of evidence there. I would like to have him back, but once it falls into a business decision, those are factors between him, his agent and our organization. We’ll see what happens.”

The wide receiver position beyond Driver is unsettled as rookie Greg Jennings tailed off late in the year, Robert Ferguson missed all but four games with a foot injury and Koren Robinson is serving a one-year suspension for violating the NFL’s substance abuse policy.

And the tight end position, considered a strength entering the season, is a colossal question mark after Bubba Franks’ disappointing season, injury-prone David Martin’s impending free agency and the unknowns of backups Donald Lee, Tory Humphrey and Zac Alcorn.

Armed with the 16th pick in the April draft and about $30 million in salary-cap space, the Packers will have the means to add such a player, but Thompson said he might have some playmakers-in-waiting already on the roster.

“Definitely, if we see an opportunity to get better, we’ll get better,” Thompson said. “I think we have some (playmakers). But I think that term is overused sometimes. I know what you’re talking about: Guys who week in and week out score touchdowns. I think everybody would say they’d like to have more. But some of those people might already be on our team and just haven’t blossomed yet. We’ll see.”
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Tony Gonzalez: wrote on Jan 12, 2007 12:40 PM:

" The Chiefs are apparently going to resign their All Pro Tight End. Another year for the Pack with Bubba Franks. Oh well; another chance for Ted to improve the team through the Draft and overpay Bubba. "

Team Player/Brett Farve: wrote on Jan 10, 2007 9:53 PM:

" Am I missing something that indicates Brett Farve is not a "TEAM PLAYER." Does he complain in any matter about his teammates, coaches, the Packers upper management, or the Packer fans. Do former Packer players/coaches bad mouth Brett Farve. Does he publically blame anyone for a loss other than himself and the entire team. Does he call the plays so he can inflate his statistics. Does he dictate to the Packer's Coaches and GM anything in regards to player personnel. For those who consider Brett Farve to be a selfish non team oriented player, please provide some evidence in support of your position. "

NO WAY TO MOSS wrote on Jan 10, 2007 8:00 PM:

" This should not even be talked about in any way shape or form. MOSS is one ofthe lowestlifes in Sports today "

why make excuses? wrote on Jan 10, 2007 7:59 PM:

" When other Quaterbacks lose games it's the Quarterbacks fault, but not for GB. It's always the other players fault or the coaches, anyones but FARVES FAULT. Until Farve throws 4-5 interceptions per Game for 5 season will the Sheep wake up "

Time to rebuild wrote on Jan 10, 2007 7:56 PM:

" I agree with some others it's time to retire number 4, he has had a good run and he should have left a couple of years back. Brett is only about Brett nowdays, no matter what sport shows say it's time to start a new era, and get a good quarterback that is a True team player.I have watched the packers for over 40 years and it's obvious that to many people are still to much in love with Brett to see that he has been done for a while,Time to move on. "

RE Packer Team/Brett Farve: wrote on Jan 10, 2007 7:17 AM:

" Right on! At least there are some people who actually watch football and football related shows before running their mouths. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jan 9, 2007 11:03 PM:

" TO: "Just a Football Fan" - It's a roll of the dice to decide if Moss will actually feel like playing during a game...did you SEE him play in the last 3 years? COME ON...MOSS has given up on himself AND everyone else...WE DON'T need him. There are MUCH better and more reliable solutions out there right now. Favre washed up? Interesting that there isn't an analyst/former coach/former pro that has suggested it's time for Favre to hang it up, so why are "fans" so anxious for that to happen? Lovie Smith was quoted to say "there is no such thing as rebuilding", and THAT is the philosophy that has turned the Bears into contenders so quicly...we need Favre. "

Packer Team/Brett Farve: wrote on Jan 9, 2007 11:01 PM:

" I have yet to read any statements from NFL people in the know who believe that the Packers have a good team and the QB (Farve) is the problem. In fact it is usually just the opposite. "

resign Green,Dump Farve wrote on Jan 9, 2007 2:15 PM:

" Dump all the TE's and get a real one GB has been without a good one since Chewy left. NEVER NEVER THINK ABOUT MOSS, this guy is totally distructive to himself and anyone around him, totally wrecked the Vikings and the Raiders. Another TO that thinks they are alll it and forget to prove it on the Field.I have to agree it's Time for Farve to Retire, his just being there to break a few records is really hurting the rebuilding of the team "

Time to RETIRE FAVRE wrote on Jan 9, 2007 2:01 PM:

" No.4 is done, has been for years....Randy Moss would be a big time WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY....Randy Moss is a complete MORON that is all done also.....Green Bay does have a good team minus the Quarterback, Favre was good years ago but lacks the desire to win every game, He has been milking his career out for the last 5 years. GB needs to develope a new QB and get on with it "

packer backer wrote on Jan 9, 2007 12:34 PM:

" First of all, Jennings although he did finish sluggish will get better, how much? I have no clue, but in the NFL rookie WR's usually dont hit their peak performance level until their third year. As far as the rest of the issues go, good ideas, I love Tony Gonzalez, but Thompson will say hes not a long term investment. Randy Moss and Turner, well honestly I love Turner, I think that he'll be great and Moss is intriguing but I can tell you right now, NEVER going to happen! Not good ol'Ted!! "

Rumor: wrote on Jan 9, 2007 12:22 PM:

" The New York Giants are apparently interested in replacing Kiki Barber with either Ahman Green (unrestricted free agent) or Michael Turner/San Diego Chargers (restricted free agent). Using incentive based contracts such as the Packers did last year with Green eliminates the potential problems associated with age/injury. Most teams in the NFL do not care if they have players at some positions for only one season as long as they play to the level of their salary. "

To: We're All in Denial wrote on Jan 8, 2007 1:54 PM:

" And who do you suggest we do this with???? Right now, he is still our best chance of winning. Not like we have even a comparable QB waiting in the helm. Rodgers will never be anything more than a wasted pick and a back up QB. There was a reason everyone else passed on him. "

Tidbits: wrote on Jan 8, 2007 12:11 PM:

" Ahman Green is considered the best Running Back available as a Free Agent. The Raiders are apparently willing to part with both Joey Porter and Randy Moss for Draft Choices no higher than the third round. Many people place the blame on the Raiders players for so-called attitude problems; any team that has gone through so many coaches in the last 10 years has a different problem, namely someone with a big "EGO" that the game has passed by (Al Davis). "

We're All in Denial wrote on Jan 8, 2007 10:39 AM:

" As much as we love #4, we won't be able to start the true rebuilding process until he leaves. His QB rating this year was worse than Rex Grossman's...that unbelievable stat hit me right between the eyes. And it was even lower last year. We continue to provide him with alibis for his bad performances...the team is bad, no TE,bad coach,young off. line etc, etc, etc. All the coaches, players and the GM are all afraid to tell him it's time, for no one wants that legacy. He'll probably come back to get all the records...we'll be 7-9 or 8-8 again, and we'll be having this same discussion again next year. The last two years have been painful..we really need to move on. "

Just a Football Fan wrote on Jan 8, 2007 10:32 AM:

" Go after Moss. The Pack would've been in the playoffs if Favre had somebody to "lob" the ball to in the red zone instead throwing(forcing) passes into a tight areas on crossing and slant routes. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jan 7, 2007 10:38 AM:

" MOCK DRAFTS...they're fun and entertaining to keep us into football a bit until draft weekend, but they are all over the place for accuracy until the last couple of weeks. Last year WE would have been drafting a certain HOUSTON TEXAN at DE. I am glad we got HAWK. Interesting that many have us looking at a back for the first round. THIS should be a really interesting off-season for our PACK. I haven't seen either back very much, but from what I HAVE seen I was more impressed by Lynch's burst once he cleared the line, and that's one thing I like about Morency compared to Green. Green is better at getting the yards when he is contacted at the line though. "

Draft Choices: wrote on Jan 7, 2007 12:32 AM:

" Mock Drafts have the Packer's either trading up and taking Running Back Adrian Petersen of Oklahoma or staying put and taking Running Back Marshawn Lynch of California. "

McCarthy says Green Bay needs more playmakers wrote on Jan 6, 2007 6:33 PM:

" Gee....really? Spend some $$$$ Thompson. "

new coach wrote on Jan 6, 2007 11:31 AM:

" The pack needs a new coach. Mccarthy is a terrible coach. He proved that over and over again this year. He took the tight ends out of the pass game to block for this overhyped zone blocking scheme. Sat one of the best and most consistent FB''s because he couldnt pickup the zone blocking. Then all of a sudden he wanted the tightends to go catch passes after not doing so for half the season no wonder they had problems. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jan 6, 2007 9:06 AM:

" ANGEL...Happy New Year! You may want to visit this site: http://www.prilosecotc.com/FantasyFootball/ It is geared toward people like you that REALLY want a chance to learn about football. I also recall seeing a day that the Pack sponsored this year for women...kind of a workshop to teach more about the game and the Pack...I will keep my eyes open. Good for you...it's one of the greatest games ever, and we have the GREATEST TEAM ever to cheer for!! "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jan 5, 2007 11:46 PM:

" to "Lots of changes" - I would agree with the changes, but I have some questions regarding 2 things in your post: first, WHY do you think we need a corner?, and, second, HOW can you even BEGIN to predict NEXT YEAR'S record when SO MUCH CAN CHANGE between now and the beginning of 2007 season? Corners: we have two VERY GOOD corners, and some pretty talented young corners behind them. We NEED a SAFETY...maybe even 2 (not real deep there)...Collins finished strong, but Manuel is a HUGE LIABILITY. Depending on how our now VETERAN line progresses in the next few months, I believe we are alot closer to where we want to be than we saw this year. Lots of variables right now. "

angel wrote on Jan 5, 2007 3:52 PM:

" I sure enjoy reading everyones comments. I dont really know THAT much about football, and all of you are sure giving me things to think about for the next coming football season. It will be really interesting to see how things play out, and to see if some of your ideas come to pass...can't wait til fall when I can add my comments again! Go Pack Go.... "

Lots of changes wrote on Jan 5, 2007 3:49 PM:

" To many issues for Green Bay to recover/rebuild in the offseason. A TE is needed, Green is a slightly above average RB, another WR and corner is also needed. The defense in whole remains suspect. The offensive line, while improving, still needs to provide more time. Add all these problems with a GM that isn't aggressive and will sit on the current talent--Pack will be lucky if there 9-7 next year, assuming Favre comes back. "

Moss... wrote on Jan 5, 2007 3:42 PM:

" Not sure how the Moss topic came up, but it's a waste of time to even discuss it. There is no way Thompson will spend a decent sum of money for any receiver in the league, let alone Moss. Having said that, to argue Green Bay is better off right now as opposed to signing Moss is preposterous. The argument is that he is lazy and will take plays off--even so, he would, at that very least act as a decoy and enable single coverage on Driver. "

Randy Moss/Oakland: wrote on Jan 5, 2007 12:57 PM:

" Randy Moss's performance as a member of the Raiders is great when giving consideration to the talent on the team (even less than the Detroit Lions) and the dysfuntionalness of the front office (Al Davis). How many of the current Packer players could have performed as well given those circumstances. The last 3 years Randy Moss has had to deal with some really poor situations as far as team Chemistry was concerned; Vikings (Red McCombs) and Raiders (Al Davis). I have a really hard time placing 100% of the blame on Randy Moss given the "EGO'S" of Red McCombs and Al Davis. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jan 5, 2007 12:22 AM:

" Do you REALLY believe MOSS will turn it around? The last 3 years he has UNDERACHIEVED: (Minn) 49 catches for 767 yds.; 2005 (Oak) 60 catches for 1005 yds.; 2006 (Oak) 42 catches for 553 yds. He averaged 1360 yds and 80+ catches per year for his first 6 years. A 'WARRIOR' leads the battle, even when victory looks lost, and a 'WARRIOR' doesn't give up: Randy Moss USED TO BE a WARRIOR, but how long before he self-destructs for his NEW team? I don't think the RISK (ie: MONEY & MORALE) is worth the potential reward. "

No Fungus Amongus wrote on Jan 4, 2007 11:22 PM:

" Packer Pride. No Randy Moss! I agree with 2020. Thompson is too conservative, and I too think he makes change at church. Sign a high production tight end. Remember the offense when we had Chewy? Franks has been a bust since day one. I think Bret's skills have been able to compensate for the lack of a go-to tight end. God willing (if Ted puts in a full offering) Bret comes back and we sign a great TE, the pack should dominate again. "

Randy Moss: wrote on Jan 4, 2007 10:55 PM:

" Randy Moss is a warrior, remember the game he played at Lambeau where he could barely walk, yet at crunch time he was able to catch the ball in the end zone. My belief is that Randy Moss does not deal well with teamates who are not putting out on the field. If that is a locker room cancer the Packers need more of them. Even though Moss and Culpepper were not big buddies they still got it done where it counts, on the field. "

Turner/Moss wrote on Jan 4, 2007 10:03 PM:

" As for Moss - he loves Brett Favre. I say if Favre comes back we go after Moss, if he doesn't than let him go else where. I'd hate to see him go to the Vikings and have to play him at least twice a year again - he's a Packer killer. I do agree with going after Michael Turner. He's been hyped up the past couple years with his blazing speed and power. I questioned his power simply because for some reason I thought he was smaller than what he was. Come to find out he weighs 230 pounds. We have money to spend - spend it on Michael Turner please. "

Cataract Jack wrote on Jan 4, 2007 9:27 PM:

" Red Zone is all that the Packers need to say. Although we all want Favre back, he has to cut down his mistakes in the Red Zone - fumbles and Int's - Franks is history - They need to resign Green big time. Take a TE in the first round- then we will be set - "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jan 4, 2007 8:12 PM:

" JENNINGS: My comments about Jennings weren't to say that he will not be GREAT. What I was trying to say is that I was AMAZED that we had gotten such a talented and agressive wide receiver thru the first 10-12 weeks of the season, and he was even playing thru pain. I lost SOME confidence in him the last 4-6 games though: he didn't look like he was running his routes as crisply, staying on the same page with reading the defense and making adjustments, going after the ball as aggressively. It could be any number of things that willnot exist next year: expecting a child, the 'ROOKIE WALL', or his ankle injury. I just have a wait and see feeling about him right now. I WANT him to be great...he seems like JUST WHAT THE PACK NEEDS. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jan 4, 2007 8:01 PM:

" MOSS is an incurable DISEASE to a team and a locker room. HE could single handedly ruin ANY chance WE may have next year. I agree, when RANDY WANTS TO PLAY he is amazing, but I haven't seen him WANT TO PLAY in over 2 YEARS. We have too many young players to bring a 'problem' on board. Robinson, while I don't agree with Thompson bringing him to the Pack (especially since he let Walker go) at least he is not a team wrecker: his problems let the team down, but he doesn't destroy team morale. NO MOSS!! PACKER LAW? "

Randy Moss: wrote on Jan 4, 2007 6:56 PM:

" Compared to Terrell Owens, Randy Moss is a great guy. Due to my job I lived in the Twin Cities for 2 years, compared to Sam Cassell and Latrell Sprewell, Randy Moss is a Choirboy. As far as Greg Jennings goes I hope I am wrong but in my "OPINION" he has reached the top of his potential, remember he came to the Packers after spending 5 years in college, thus he is more advanced than most skill position players entering the NFL. "

disgruntled... wrote on Jan 4, 2007 3:54 PM:

" MOSS?? please say it isn't so...i don't care how good he is, that's all we need is another athlete who put's him-self before the team. i'm so tired of these high-paid prima-donna's who always end up being a distraction. the only way i would sign him is if the contract was such that, it would be a "pay as you play" contract, where you actually forfeit money for every play you decide to take off!! get paid weekly based on how well you performed the past pay period, on AND off the field......yea right, like that would ever happen.....it would change sports....jennings is a future stud, who, like all rookies, hit the wall, even hawk's productivity fell off some....as far as #4 coming back...i would love to see the look on my buddy's face when he breaks all of marino's records on the way to his 2nd super bowl...... "

Javon Walker wrote on Jan 4, 2007 3:20 PM:

" That's just it...Thompson wasn't willing to give Walker any money so he left. And we all saw how he performed this year in Denver. The Pack definitely had the cash to retain him, simply didn't do it. Truth be told, he probably wouldn't have stayed anyway though. The result? We only had one solid, dependable receiver this year. Packer fans can forget Thompson being aggressive and spending a lot of money this offseason. Gonzalez, Moss...not going to happen. "

Randy Moss/Playmakers: wrote on Jan 4, 2007 2:58 PM:

" If someone was willing to take a huge gamble on Koren Robinson the chance to get Randy Moss would be a no brainer. Moss is 10 times the player Robinson is on the field with 1/10th the baggage off the field. As far as new playmakers on the current Packer roster, give me a break, almost all of the Packer's second string skill position players were cut by other teams. At this time Javon Walker looks like a steal compared to Robinson/Moss, all you had to do is pay him Fair Market compensation. "

Thompson's closed wallet wrote on Jan 4, 2007 2:44 PM:

" All of us Packer fans can wish and dream of what's to come next year. But in all actuality, Thompson will do what he does every year...which isn't much. Although Gonzalez is older, it would boost our TE position. With the salary cap space we had this year, Thompson could/should have been much more agressive. For a team to go 8-8 and have millions in cap room is ridiculous. Although it wouldn't happen anyways,(personally don't like Moss) say what you will about him and his disrespect to Lambeau. Favre loves to toss the long ball despite the risk/coverage and Moss is just the guy to go deep and come down with the ball in double coverage. He made Cunningham and Culpepper a lot better than they were. 5 games into the season the animosity would be gone. "

i agree wrote on Jan 4, 2007 2:31 PM:

" that we should get randy moss. i am a die hard packers fan but his talent is undeniable. i would rather eat my pride and have a 14-2 team than not have moss and a 6-10 team. "

D wrote on Jan 4, 2007 1:11 PM:

" I almost completely agree with Pack Attack, except for the comment about Jennings. I think Jennings will be an absolute stud. However, you are right on about Ted Thompson being the most boring GM in pro sports. In Ben Stein's voice--"We could have playmakers-in-waiting already on the roster." Give me a break. $30 mil in cap room, the Packers could go after both a high profile TE AND high profile RB...think someone like Rudi Johnson. And to the person who was saying we should get Moss.....ARE YOU KIDDING ME? THE SAME GUY WHO "MOONED" LAMBEAU?? Your not a true Packer fan..... "

Ted Thompson - RE: PackAttack2020 wrote on Jan 4, 2007 12:24 PM:

" I agree - he wants to build through the draft, but when you have options out there and the money to spend - go big time and make something happen. He is too conservative. "

moss wrote on Jan 4, 2007 11:04 AM:

" Rumor has the Raiders giving Randy Moss back to the Vikings for a 3rd rd pick. The Packers could offer their 2nd round pick next year for Moss. Say what you want about the guy, but he is a stud. The Raiders are a pathetic team and he was one of many that hated the coach and the team's direction. Can you imagine Brett Favre throwing to Donald Driver and Randy Moss next year with Jennings and Koren Robinson as the 3rd and 4th receivers and Ruvell Martin as the #5? They need a playmaker and that's exactly what Moss is. They are $30 million under the cap. They should also make a strong push for Michael Turner (Chargers). He is the best back up runningback in the NFL - Ahman Green is getting old and Morency doesn't have enough power to be a primary ball carrier. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jan 4, 2007 8:00 AM:

" Typical Ted Thompson: "Armed with the 16th pick in the April draft and about $30 million in salary-cap space, the Packers will have the means to add such a player, but Thompson said he might have some playmakers-in-waiting already on the roster." I would bet he makes change from the church donation plate on Sundays. We need a SOLID veteran tight end and a decent rookie, and we HAVE to add a BIGGER fast receiver to give Driver and Favre help. I don't have as much confidence in Jennings: it may have been his ankle bothering him, but he wasn't nearly the same aggressive wideout that he was at the beginning of the year. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes


 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Jobs

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.