1231 wrote on Oct 19, 2007 2:12 PM:
" In 1900 view looking south and across West Ave. At the right is th Cargill Mansion, before the remodeling in 1906. In the center, the Colman/Berger/Skaff. Just to the left of the Lucius Colman/Skaff house, is the Easton Mansion, where the Bethany Care facility now stands. In 1970 the wrecking ball reduced the Cargill Mansion to rubble. The way it was. Colamn was owner of the C L Colman Lumber co.;supporter of the La Crosse Public Library, Pres. of the Wis. Histoircal Society, a Northwestern graduated, serve on police & fire commission, Director of La Crosse Hosptal, a founder of the library and chief benfactor. He found his greatest pleasures in giving to allviate distress.Will the Skaff house become history of the past? "
PAL Member wrote on Sep 4, 2007 2:31 PM:
" It is very interesting to read the range of comments about the excellent article on 8/26/07 on historic preservation and the endangered, lost and saved buildings in La Crosse. We do live in a pluralistic society and all viewpoints are welcomed on this issue. I am grateful for the individuals who have preserved their homes, businesses and places of worship as part of the legacy of the community that is La Crosse. I am also very pleased by the current interest in saving our architectural heritage expressed by many residents in the current discussion about the fate of the Colman/Skaff House. "
kathrynp. wrote on Sep 2, 2007 9:06 AM:
" If the PAL wants to form a grant to help preserve these "historic" buildings- please so do.
If you look at the current statistics, it is easier to build new- than to restore unless you have 40-50 hours a week in sweat equity you can put into the building. i don't know any one like that, do you?
The old adage of ,"putting your money where you mouth is,"comes to mind. I look forward to seeing PAL's grant of half a million dollars to renovate those two buildings they highlighted.
Why does PAL have to vilify people who are trying hard- but aren't millionaires?
"
Wake up! wrote on Aug 29, 2007 10:37 AM:
" People, people. We all know why we can't keep old buildings up, because, we, as wasteful and short-sighted folk, want NEW, as NEW is ALWAYS better... just look at our infrastructure! The Chinese will have hi-speed trains before the US, but WE DON'T CARE, because we want BIG CARS, MORE CARS, MORE ROADS, NEW ROADS, and NEW HOUSES! Who cares that they are poorly made, terrible for fuel use, NEW. Just keep repeating, NEW, NEW, NEW... "
To 9:55 am poster wrote on Aug 28, 2007 7:13 AM:
" Yes, you always seem to give those. Of course that's always easier to do when your wrong. "
Merri Cvetan mecdesignstudio.com wrote on Aug 27, 2007 7:26 PM:
" Sometimes wake-up calls happen before it is too late. Cudos to PAL and the Tribune. We can't always save every historic building (although I wish we could). We won't save any if the community is not made aware of the historical significance of the structure and it's connection to our past and ultimately our future. "
response to "what a waste" wrote on Aug 27, 2007 12:39 PM:
" You are right that feeding children and appropriate health care are important issues. But, historic preservation makes good economic sense.... if we preserve our old buildings, rather than tear them down to go into landfills, and then save more money doing rehab than what comparable new construction would cost.... thus saving money means that we could, potentially, put more money into feeding children and better healthcare.... you need to look at the issue holistically... it all works together. "
What a waste wrote on Aug 27, 2007 10:08 AM:
" They are BUILDINGS, people.... let's put this in perspective. How about spending as much time trying to save people? What a silly, unfortunate waste of time when we have children going hungry or going without healthcare. It's embarrassing. "
The Short Answer wrote on Aug 27, 2007 9:55 AM:
" NO "
To 10:19 pm poster wrote on Aug 27, 2007 7:04 AM:
" I guess he told you huh? Better make sure you get your facts straight next time... "
SOB or MYOB? wrote on Aug 26, 2007 11:09 PM:
" SAVE OUR BUILDINGS or MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS? If you don't like what your neighbors plan to do, you buy them out not tell them what to do with THEIR property. Haven't got the money, please DO NOT expect the government to buy it and spend taxpayer money to make a castle out of it! Spend the money on roads and jails and no more waste on logos and traffic circles and bath houses. "
RE; Response to Michel Brewery wrote on Aug 26, 2007 10:19 PM:
" Your wrong. "
Response to Michel Brewery wrote on Aug 26, 2007 7:50 PM:
" Dear Writer, I don't know where you got your information from, but the Michel Brewery was torn down to make a used parking lot for Dahl Ford.... which is what it is today. The local preservationists, including the Heritage Preservation Commission and PAL, tried hard to save the building, but Mr. Dahl threatend the city council that he would move his business to West Salem if he didn't get his way.... THAT is why as a preservationist, I will never buy from Dahl Ford. There was NO agreement by Dahl Ford to beautify the lot (though it would be nice) and PAL has absolutely no power over what Dahl Ford does with their vacant lot... so DO NOT blame PAL for what it looks like today.... talk to the Ford dealer.... "
Michel Brewery -- This is why pal has and get's no respect. wrote on Aug 26, 2007 8:02 AM:
" Once the building was down, they put it on ignore. Remember the agreements to save part's of the architecure, and how the low would become a landscaped area making use of the salvaged parts of the building. How it would be a beautiful compromise? It's a dirt lot 10 years later. I remember, which is something PAL should have done, but of course didn't. "
LEVEL THE NAVAL RESERVE BUILDING wrote on Aug 26, 2007 8:00 AM:
" and put the property on the tax rolls. It's an insignificant ugly building, has no historical value and is just a plain dump. Level it. "
Curiosity wrote on Aug 26, 2007 7:36 AM:
" Just wondering why all those old buildings in Europe can be preserved,(some hundreds of year's old),and we don't seem to be doing the same thing in our country.The list of eight biggest losses is staggering.I remember some of those buildings and I thought they were worth renovating.I know there is the cost involved but I still don't understand it I guess. "