Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Sunday, January 20, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (37 comment(s))

Wide range of women get abortions; most already have at least one child


.
NEW YORK — In American pop culture, the face of abortion is often a frightened teenager, nervously choosing to terminate an unexpected pregnancy. The numbers tell a far more complex story in which financial stress can play a pivotal role.

Half of the roughly 1.2 million U.S. women who have abortions each year are 25 or older. Only about 17 percent are teens. About 60 percent have given birth to least one child prior to getting an abortion.
A disproportionately high number are black or Hispanic. And regardless of race, high abortion rates are linked to hard times.

“It doesn’t just happen to young people, it doesn’t necessarily have to do with irresponsibility,” said Miriam Inocencio, president of Planned Parenthood of Rhode Island. “Women face years and years of reproductive life after they’ve completed their families, and they’re at risk of an unintended pregnancy that can create an economic strain.”

Activists on both sides of the abortion debate will soon be marking the 35th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision, which established a nationwide right to abortion.

In recent years, the number of abortions has fallen; the 1.2 million tallied for 2005 was down 8 percent from 2000, and the per-capita abortion rate was the lowest since 1974. But overall, since the Roe ruling on Jan. 22, 1973, there have been roughly 50 million abortions in the U.S., and more than one-third of adult women are estimated to have had at least one.

Who are these women?

Much of the public debate focuses on teens, as evidenced by the constant wrangling over parental notification laws and movies like the current hit “Juno,” in which the pregnant heroine heads to an abortion clinic, then decides to have the baby.

In fact, the women come from virtually every demographic sector. But year after year the statistics reveal that black women and economically struggling women — who have above-average rates of unintended pregnancies — are far more likely than others to have abortions. About 13 percent of American women are black, yet new figures from the Centers for Disease Control show they account for 35 percent of the abortions.

Black anti-abortion activists depict this phenomenon in dire terms — “genocide” and “holocaust,” for example. But often the women getting the abortions say they act in the interests of children they already have.

“It wasn’t a hard decision for me to make, because I knew where I wanted to go in my life — I’ve never regretted it,” said Kimberly Mathias, 28, an African-American single mother from Missouri.

She had an abortion at 19, while already raising a 2-year-old son.

“It wasn’t hard to realize I didn’t want another child at that time,” Mathias said. “I was trying to take care of the one I had, and going to college and working at the same time.”

She was able to graduate, now has an insurance job, and — still a single mother — has a 3-year-old son as well as her first-born, now 11.

By contrast, Alveda King, a niece of Martin Luther King Jr., calls herself a “reformed murderer” for undergoing two abortions when she was young.

Now an outspoken anti-abortion campaigner, King said the best way to reduce abortions among black women is to dissuade more of them from premarital sex.

“We give free sex education, free condoms, free birth control,” she said. “That’s almost like permission to have free sex, and the higher the rate of sexual activity, the higher the rate of unintended pregnancy.”

Anti-abortion activist Day Gardner of the National Black Pro-Life Union said many blacks are unaware of their community’s high abortion rate.

“We don’t talk about it,” Gardner said. “It’s a silent killer among us.”

She contends abortion-rights supporters tempt black women into abortion by suggesting they can’t afford to raise the child. But Gardner also acknowledges some black women make this argument on their own.

“We had the whole civil rights movement — now we’re in a place where we’re moving further toward equality,” Gardner said. “So women think, ‘For once, I can see the American dream. I can have the house and the job, but it would postpone it to have another child. I can’t afford to take time off.’”

Dr. Vanessa Cullins, a black physician who is Planned Parenthood’s national vice president for medical affairs, said the allegations of “black genocide” do not help women meet day-to-day challenges.

“These actions take attention away from medically proven ways to reduce unintended pregnancy — comprehensive sex education, affordable birth control, and open and honest conversations about relationships,” she said.

Looking beyond racial dividing lines, Cullins views the right to abortion as an important component in the ability of all American women to determine the right size for their family.

“Groups that become assimilated in U.S. culture and experience economic opportunities naturally decide to limit family size, because they want to take part in the American dream,” she said. “If you’re a single mother, achieving the dream is all the harder, so it makes sense to limit family size so you can shower as much support as you can on the children you have.”

Georgette Forney, who had an abortion when she was 16 and now is an anti-abortion campaigner leading Anglicans for Life, says she often sees economic pressures triggering abortions, even in middle-class families.

“In one situation, the husband was adamant that they were on track to pay for their two sons’ college education, and a third child would throw off his whole calculation,” Forney recounted. “So that baby was aborted and that woman was devastated. It was a five-year process to recover.”

Forney said she also encountered a single mother who was worried she might lose custody of her daughter in light of a suit by the biological father. The woman then became pregnant, Forney said, and had an abortion in viola-tion of her own beliefs because she feared having a second child would jeopardize prospects for keeping her daughter.

“We’ve begun to depend on abortions,” Forney said. “We feel we have to choose between our unborn child and our born children.”

Martha Girard, on the other hand, says she’s appalled by the notion women should lose the right to choose.

A hospital ultrasound technician from Pleasant Prairie, Wis., and a mother of three, Girard had an abortion two years ago, at age 44, when she mistakenly thought she was too old to get pregnant.

Having been through three difficult pregnancies previously, and coping with a mentally disabled eldest son, she felt abortion was the prudent choice.

“I knew that this pregnancy would end up badly — I could feel it — and we’ve already got enough problems with the mentally ill son,” Girard said.

“I was very sad and depressed the first week,” she added. “But because it’s hard on you emotionally and some women regret it, that doesn’t mean it’s wrong, that someone else should decide for you.”

The Journal of Family Issues published a report earlier this month asserting women often choose abortion because of their wish to be good parents.

That means women who have no children want the conditions to be right when they do, and women who already are mothers want to care responsibly for their existing children, said the lead author, Rachel Jones, a researcher with the Guttmacher Institute.

“These women believed that it was more responsible to terminate a pregnancy than to have a child whose health and welfare could be in question,” Jones said.

Even among many abortion opponents, the Guttmacher Institute — which supports abortion rights — is considered the nation’s best source of abortion statistics.

Federal statistics do not include California, the most populous state, because its government does not provide data. But Guttmacher researchers surveyed abortion providers there as well as in other states to produce the latest national estimate of 1.2 million abortions in 2005. That’s down from a peak of 1.6 million in 1990 but still represents more than 20 percent of all pregnancies.

One of the Guttmacher’s top researchers, Stanley Henshaw, said the recent drop may disguise the fact abortion rates remain relatively high for black and Hispanic women. He believes the most effective countermeasure would be wider availability of contraceptives such as intrauterine device, or IUDs, that don’t require attention as frequently as condoms or birth-control pills.

Though abortion is commonplace across the country, urban areas have far higher rates than rural areas, where access to abortion providers can be difficult.

New York, New Jersey, California, Delaware, Nevada, Maryland and Florida had the highest abortion rates in 2005, according to the new Guttmacher report released this week. Wyoming, Idaho, Kentucky, South Dakota and Mississippi had the lowest rates — the latter two states have just a single abortion clinic in operation.

Susan Hill, founder of the National Women’s Health Organization that runs the remaining Mississippi clinic, says the statistics may not fully reflect a subgroup of relatively affluent women who obtain unreported abortions through their private doctors.

“In Mississippi, it’s the poor women who don’t have access to that who have to run through the maze of pro-testers screaming and yelling abuse,” Hill said. “Wealthier women can be more creative about their alternatives.”

According to Guttmacher data, the abortion rate among women living below the federal poverty level is more than four times higher that among women from middle-income and affluent households.

An increasing number of women avoid surgery by using the RU-486 abortion pill or other early medication — these now account for about 13 percent of all abortions.

Of all U.S. women getting abortions, about 54 percent are doing so for the first time, while one-fifth have had at least two previous abortions. Of those over 20, the majority have attended college. Almost a third have been married at some point. About 60 percent have at least one child; one-third have two or more.

“I don’t think most people understand that these are women who have families, who are making a very serious decision about their reproductive health,” said Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. “The stereotype is that the decision is made lightly. It is not.”-

On the Web

Abortion statistics: www.guttmacher.org
.




 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Twilite wrote on Jan 24, 2008 12:08 AM:

" LOL....hun, menstruation is a process in which a woman's body is preparing itself for pregnancy. If an egg is not fertilized and attached to the uterine wall, the uterine wall sheds since such wall is not needed to house a non-existent human life. In terms that you may better understand....if an egg is fertilized, you will not get your period. At the moment of fertilization, the "fertilized egg's" genetic make-up is complete, including its sex. It's funny though, thanks....where'd you get your info - did you make it up? "

Twilite wrote on Jan 24, 2008 12:08 AM:

" Oh my gosh, you can't be serious!!! You had better read up a little before you start rambling...Human life does begin at fertilization, whether you believe this life is a person or worthy of rights is what the entire abortion debate is about. The fertilized egg takes approx. 3 days to reach the uterus. There are only about 3 days/month that a woman is fertile. The most fertile days are generally two weeks after a period. I laughed when I read "Eighty percent of a woman's fertilized eggs are rinsed and flushed out of her body once a month during those delightful few days she has. They wind up on sanitary napkins, and yet they are fertilized eggs. So basically what these anti-abortion people are telling us is that any woman who's had more than more than one period is a serial killer!" "

i beat up your lawn gnome wrote on Jan 23, 2008 2:58 PM:

" Twilite kinda touched on the "When life begins" theory so here is my opinion. Most of the really hardcore people will tell you life begins at fertilization. Fertilization, when the sperm fertilizes the egg. But even after the egg is fertilized, it's still six or seven days before it reaches the uterus and pregnancy begins, and not every egg makes it that far. Eighty percent of a woman's fertilized eggs are rinsed and flushed out of her body once a month during those delightful few days she has. They wind up on sanitary napkins, and yet they are fertilized eggs. So basically what these anti-abortion people are telling us is that any woman who's had more than more than one period is a serial killer! "

Twilite wrote on Jan 23, 2008 12:27 PM:

" To kamikazefaase: So we can agree on some things. But as always, there is the simple fact that abortion depends on when you believe the child turns into a "person"... Most pro-lifers believe that a human is a person from the moment it's soul enters the body - at conception. Pro-choicers believe that a human is a person from the moment of birth. We're both fighting for our causes and not every one will ever agree. Pro-life is always going to see abortion as killing an innocent life while pro-choice focuses on the mother's rights, not giving thought to the fetus as a person or even a human being. "

Twilite wrote on Jan 23, 2008 12:24 PM:

" Or....all the ones that are for abortion are the ones you'd want to abort in the first place. "

i beat up your lawn gnome wrote on Jan 23, 2008 10:31 AM:

" Don't you find it mildly ironic that of all the people against abortion are people you wouldn't want to f**k in the first place?" George Carlin "

kamikazefaase wrote on Jan 23, 2008 7:37 AM:

" ollie: I agree with you on the first three of the four areas concerning dads with no say. The only one I disagree with you on is the one where the man wants the future child and she elects to have an abortion. The woman is not a man's property to have his kid if he so chooses. She bears the physical evidence for nine months, he doesn't. So it should remain her decision if she chooses to abort so the male can find someone who chooses to bear him a child if they together so choose. "

kamikazefaase wrote on Jan 23, 2008 7:25 AM:

" Twilite: I believe that by simple definitions that a fetus doesn't become a baby until BIRTH because at that point, it can survive outside the mother's womb. Until that blessed event, the fetus is completely depended upon the mother for nearly everything to both grow and survive. Once born, others can assist in the development both for growth and survival. One rare exception to this is the stillborn. I also believe the Constitution only protects the truly living: those that are already presently accounted for by the Census. The unborn still don't count in that category alone. Until born, they are not even potential voters or citizens. And it isn't until birth that all people are witness to a new life because of the obesity issues of today. "

kamikazefaase wrote on Jan 23, 2008 7:11 AM:

" Twilite: I'm not surprised that you are pro-life. However, your comment concerning the use of birth control still amazes me in one sense. Your statement is based only on lowering the risk of becoming pregnant which is opposed to completely preventing it from happening. Short of sterilization, most prolifers are against dealing with this part of the equation of the "oops" pregnancy even when protection was used. The morning after pill issue plus cases of rape and incest still prevent me from ever joining your side of the debate. With autism and many other birth defects on the rise, it seems these children you wish to bring into the world will need even more tax dollars to help live. That strain on already taxed resources will prevent this planet from ever recovering from its own manmade crisis. "

Twilite wrote on Jan 22, 2008 9:38 PM:

" You say you're pro-choice because of true science? Enlighten me, will you? What science do you go by? The same science that gives information on the development of human life? When does the heart start beating again? When does a human being have all of his/her unique DNA in place? Oh right, science.... I'm pro-life because I live in the real world based on basic human rights, basic human biology, and applied compassion. "

Twilite wrote on Jan 22, 2008 9:38 PM:

" If women should control their own destiny by controlling their own right to live....I don't think women should be allowed to drive cars. Far more people die in car accidents than from giving birth. You could make the argument that women "choose" to drive cars. But hey, I say a woman chooses to have sex, knowing the risk of pregnancy. Use birth control properly and your risk is lowered...just like if you use a seat belt when driving. "

Twilite wrote on Jan 22, 2008 9:38 PM:

" kamikazefaase: Thank you for proving my point. Of course this thought is off base. Much like the pro-choice argument that I've heard millions of times about the organ donor. It makes no sense because normally when you choose not to donate your organs, you are not choosing to directly kill an innocent human being, let alone your own offspring. Let's use real facts, should we? You're right, pregnancy can cause complications for many women. Most of these complications are temporary. Abortion can also cause complications. And women can DIE FROM COMPLICATIONS OF ABORTION as well!!!! Surprise! It's just under-reported because many times the abortion is hidden from family/friends/medical professionals. Also, abortion always kills at least one, pregnancy usually adds one. "

kamikazefaase wrote on Jan 22, 2008 2:37 AM:

" Twilite: I found your thought amusing but off base. The fetus...is completely depended upon the female for survival until born. Pregnancy is a medical condition that can cause complications for any woman. That is why women can DIE GIVING CHILDBIRTH. Women must at all times be able to control their own destiny by controlling their own right to live. Like any infliction, the patient controls what kind of treatment they receive including any organ being removed. Once given up, organs are not returned to the original owner because of the complications it would cause both parties. That's why many tests are done prior to such surgery. Your thought lost merit base on both science and reality. I'm pro-choice because I live in the real world based on true science and applied faith. "

Twilite wrote on Jan 21, 2008 11:57 PM:

" Last I knew, the fetus/embryo/conceptus/human being/person/baby is not part of the woman's body. I'm all for women deciding what happens to their own body....as long as they aren't harming another's body, one that they in fact helped to create. Here's a little twist on the pro-choice argument of letting someone use one's organs. Let's say I signed up for something knowing that my kidney may need to be taken away for nine months. Just when my kidney is taken away for someone else to borrow, I decide I want it back. This means that other human will die. That's not right. I knew the risks, I need to deal with the consequences. And next time, I'll be sure to use birth control.... "

kamikazefaase wrote on Jan 21, 2008 1:55 AM:

" To mj54636: The reasons for abortion still are: "Rape, Incest, and Inconvenience" which is a college paper I wrote in the late 1970's. Abortion is something that remains a need still in society to protect women from victimization and health. Because women are among the living and can sustain their own life, they have the right to direct their own care. I wrote then that the marriage contract should deal with children born into it from BOTH parents so each has their say, its the out-of-wedlock situation that remain a woman's exclusive decision presently. Many men walk away from such responsiblity because like a previous blogger mentions they have no say. I agree that such women who has such child and the man wants nothing to do with it shall not be held responsible for it, including financial. That way choice is truly hers. "

hsvee81 wrote on Jan 20, 2008 10:07 PM:

" Come on people, are some of you serious? The issue here is that there are a lot of unplanned pregnancies in this country each year. I think that stress should be put on the importance of birth control for BOTH women and men (yes, men play a part in this too) and also abstinance. We need to be more responsible people... not to mention the very scary risk of contracting STDs and HIV when one doesn't protect him/herself. But if it comes down to it, a woman still has a right to choose what to do with her body. To the men: if it were possible for you to conceive a child, wouldn't you want to know all of your options and wouldn't you want to be able to choose whichever one was right for you? "

ollie wrote on Jan 20, 2008 7:51 PM:

" I still have a problem with this abortion thing. If a woman decides to keep the kid "dad"is on the hook for a few decades, with little or no say, in the current court system. It took two to tango, yet only one gets to decide how many lives to potentially ruin. Women do and should know "when" they are fertile, is a guy supposed to bring a thermometer on dates or what? If men and women had an equal say then I would be less troubled. She says no abortion, he says abortion, "she" pays to raise it. If they bot agree either way...no problem. If she wants abortion and he wants the kid he raises it ...she is free to get on with her life. Men lose in this system either way. If we had better/ idiot proof birth control, we wouldn't be talking here. "

LCITCOTU wrote on Jan 20, 2008 7:15 PM:

" Is this blog really discussion of the article? It seems like the same tired rehash of prolife and prochoice arguments. One of the benefits of statistics like those in the article is that they should help both pro-choice and prolife folks think more fully about what kinds of interventions would reduce the number of abortions and unwanted pregnancies. 4D images won't help a woman who has already had a child. She knows. 60% of women having an abortion know. Reasonable access to high quality birth control is the only really effective way to bring down the rate of unwanted pregnancies. "

area male wrote on Jan 20, 2008 7:01 PM:

" Actually the world will keep spinning whether we're here or not (actually, it would probably be a better place). I'll give you another try. "

mj54636 wrote on Jan 20, 2008 6:54 PM:

" An objective reason? How about the fact that they are necessary to keep the world going? Although certain aspects of it may not be the greatest, maybe one of these "mistakes" will make the world a better place! "

area male wrote on Jan 20, 2008 6:51 PM:

" mj54636: It would never get to that point, but I think it is something to strive for. Anyway, I see no point in having children. Can anybody give one objective reason to have children in this era? "

mj54636 wrote on Jan 20, 2008 6:32 PM:

" Re: area male
You're all for sterilization and abortion because you don't think it is right to bring children into this world, how will there be any children left to adopt?? "

mytwocents wrote on Jan 20, 2008 6:28 PM:

" Oh my, thank God you are not my Jesus. "

area male wrote on Jan 20, 2008 6:27 PM:

" Dear Jesus,

Considering there are over 1,000,000 abortions each year in this country alone, having an abortion is clearly an easy decision. You can get it done in one easy appointment with a few pills.

Love,
Santa "

happymom wrote on Jan 20, 2008 5:56 PM:

" Perhaps some of the decline in abortion is due to new technology like 4D imaging that gives a fantastic ultrasound picture of that BABY long before a mother ever lays eyes on him/her. After seeing picture of your very alive BABY, it's harder to consider making him/her very dead. "

area male wrote on Jan 20, 2008 3:37 PM:

" ohplze: no vasectomy, I only date post-menopausal women. "

Teiresias wrote on Jan 20, 2008 3:22 PM:

" OK, Terminus, let me guess: you're white, male and middle-aged?
"

jenisgone wrote on Jan 20, 2008 2:52 PM:

" mj54636; they do perform abortion on unwanted animal pregnancies. An abortion would not kill a puppy it would kill a fetus.
I believe abortion should be legal, but it should have a 12 week maximum unless the baby is ill. If you don't know you want an abortion by then you're out of luck.
My only issue with this article is King saying that women are lured into having abortions. That is a load of crap. Is being given your options is being lured? NO. "

ohplze wrote on Jan 20, 2008 12:51 PM:

" To -area male -i hope youve had a vasectemy. if not dont throw stones if you live in a glass house "

hsvee81 wrote on Jan 20, 2008 12:11 PM:

" I personally feel it is a woman's choice to have an abortion or not. A woman is capable of choosing what she wants in her life. All though there are thousands of potential adoptive parents in this country, it may not be easy for a woman to carry a child for 9 months, deliver that baby and then give it away. The alternatives are raising a baby that she is not financially or emotionally stable for or giving away a child that she will always wonder about. I'm sure that abortion is never an easy decision for a woman to make, but making that decision never makes her a killer or less of a human being. "

The Al-man wrote on Jan 20, 2008 11:51 AM:

" Remember the bumper sticker: 'It's a b*st*rd, not a choice!' :) "

Mack wrote on Jan 20, 2008 11:49 AM:

" While abortion is very sad, we will know the proponets of outlawing abortion are sincere when they offer fetuses social security numbers and healthcare to go along with it. Until that happens, abortion in politics in America is just a vote getting con that people fall for every four years. Just look at George Bush, for six years he had a conservative senate, house, supreme court and executive branch and while he ran on the rights of the unborn, there was never any action. It is already becoming an issue for 2008 and we will see the same results again. "

area male wrote on Jan 20, 2008 11:25 AM:

" I'm all for sterilization (as with pets), but until people start doing that, it'll have to be abortion.

Anyway, who would want to bring a child into this messed up world? There are enough unfed mouths as it is.

Having children is selfish. There is nothing cool about children. There are enough unwanted children out there that there should be mandatory sterilization. If you want a child, adopt. That's noble. "

pfrancis wrote on Jan 20, 2008 11:21 AM:

" Answer: because we are a nation of gimmie, gimmie, gimmie...for the most part...

And we lack self control and respect for all life, especially unborn human life... "

mj54636 wrote on Jan 20, 2008 9:49 AM:

" Alot can be learned about life from the way we treat our dogs. If we don't want to have a litter of puppies we a)don't let them have sex (abstinance) b)get them fixed (birth control) or c) give them away (adoption). As humans, we have all the same options. However, people feel they need one more option: abortion. However, if we ever killed a puppy because we didn't want it, we would have the animal rights groups all over us. Why is it ok for people to kill babies when they have so many other options? "

mytwocents wrote on Jan 20, 2008 9:21 AM:

" Choice is good. "

Terminus wrote on Jan 20, 2008 8:42 AM:

" Who are these women? Selfish, cold blooded killers. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.