mindless nomind wrote on Mar 25, 2008 8:27 PM:
" I don't think judging someones guilt/innocence over a few lines of a news story makes much sense. DNA is not the whole story, just a factual statement in the case. When you have a lengthy criminal record like Amerson, hopefully the DA is checking all the evidence in the case. "
antieverything wrote on Mar 25, 2008 6:17 PM:
" The Da is gonna lose this one.. Where do they find these horrible prosecuters. Plus shes facing Colgan. "
Im Still Jackson wrote on Mar 25, 2008 1:19 PM:
" Just another right to due process being trampled on. The charge should be dismissed and the man free and cleared. If the DA thinks she can build a case then recharge him later since he has not been tried anywhere yet except in the media.I dont know this man but the evidence that has become a staple of conviction says he is innocent. Ms Bonnett is not judge and jury she is an assitant DA with a very weak case. Stop embarassing yourself. "
Im Still Jackson wrote on Mar 25, 2008 1:09 PM:
" HMMMMMMMM same DA as the Jacques case where the man didnt recieve a fair trial at all because he was poor and here you have a case where DNA EXCLUDED the man and she continued to assume he is guilty and is not prepared to dismiss the case.THIS IS THE DIFFERENCE WHEN YOU CAN AFFORD TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY and dont use the public defenders office. DNA has convicted many a person because its 99.9 % accurate so how can you continue an investigation into a case where that same evidence has cleared the accused. ONLY IN LA CROSSE COUNTY WI with an over zealous assistant DA trying to make a name for herself at all cost! "
valerieM wrote on Mar 25, 2008 10:56 AM:
" if it wasn't him, then why aren't people concerned that there is an armed rapist still at large? "
Precious1 wrote on Mar 25, 2008 10:46 AM:
" What's the point of rape if you don't "finish the job"?
It would seem impossible to rape and not leave DNA
of some sort...fluids escape even without
"finishing the job"
It sounds like another false accusation.
Women that cry false rape should be put on a sexual
registry so men know to stay the he!! away from them. "
Willie wrote on Mar 25, 2008 10:30 AM:
" People watch too much CSI! DNA evidence is not the only kind of evidence. The lack of it doesn't mean he didn't do it. There could have been problems with collecting the evidence, the victim may have washed or wiped it off, or maybe he didn't finish the job if you know what I mean. If there is not enough other evidence to support the assault, then and only then should he be let off the hook. Of course if the victim made it up, in light of the new evidence she may recant. In the mean time he is already on the street free on signature bond. "
askalano wrote on Mar 25, 2008 10:20 AM:
" How can this man still be held when DNA cleared him? I think Attorney Tania Bonnett just wants to waste tax payers money and keep this guy in jail. "
Advertisement
