Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > Opinion > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Sunday, May 04, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (12 comment(s))

Gas tax holiday won’t help, and sends wrong message


.
Republican John McCain and Democrat Hillary Clinton have both proposed that the government stop charging consumers the 18.4-cent federal gas tax from Memorial Day to Labor Day.

They say it would help beleaguered motorists cope with the sharp increase in gasoline prices.
But their plans are empty promises, and bad policy from both a practical and philosophical standpoint.

First the practical: There is little reason to assume that consumers would see much benefit from the “tax holiday.” During the summer heavy-driving season, refineries are working hard to produce enough fuel, and prices go up. If the price is lower momentarily, people will drive more, and the price will go up as a result of the impact on gasoline supply and refinery capacity.

The Washington Post quoted Harvard economics professor N. Gregory Mankiw, who argued that the biggest beneficiary of the tax holiday will be the oil companies, not consumers.

“What you learn in Economics 101 is that if producers can’t produce much more, when you cut the tax on that good, the tax is kept ... by the suppliers and is not passed on to consumers.”

There also is a political and philosophical reason to avoid the tax holiday. And that is the state of our roads, highways, bridges and other infrastructure. The United States faces a crisis in infrastructure. Much of our highway system was built 30 or more years ago and is in need of repair and replacement. And don’t forget last year’s disastrous bridge collapse in Minneapolis, in which 13 people died.

McCain and Clinton’s proposed gas tax holiday will cost the federal government $9 billion, money that otherwise could be used for repair and maintenance of roads, highways and bridges.

To his credit, Barack Obama, the other Democratic presidential candidate, has resisted the siren song for tax-cut promises during an election campaign.

He once supported temporarily suspending the Illinois gas tax in 2000, but apparently has learned the error of his ways.

“We cannot deliver on a better energy policy unless we change how business is done in Washington,” he said at a recent campaign rally. “That’s what you need from a president — someone who’s going to tell you the truth.”

The truth is that the gas tax holiday is a political stunt that will enrich the oil companies more than it will help the consumers — and it will make it tougher to make the road repairs we need to make.
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

notme wrote on May 9, 2008 7:25 AM:

" BrianGSmith wrote on May 4, 2008 5:41 PM:
You are RIGHT but I would like your opinion on:

Over 3,000 Americans dead. Several buildings damaged or destroyed, thousands laid off, and the nations economy put into turmoil.

So what IS your suggestion for keeping the next 19 dudes with $5.00 box cutters from causing even more damage?

You are correct in the fact that the borrow and spend Republicans or NOT the the ones to handle fiscal duties responsibly, but neither are the tax and spend Democrats. "

just al wrote on May 6, 2008 6:10 AM:

" Just what they need, post office having another day off. They are closed for more holidays than most other workers and they still go "postal". Hey band-aids are good they do accomplish what they are designed for. If you do not want the break I'll take your share. It is not like the oil companies can not afford to pick up the tab. Billions of dollars of profit per QUARTER!! "

Diane wrote on May 5, 2008 7:46 PM:

" A gas holiday tax reduction is like putting a bandaid on a large sore. I returned from St. Paul/Minneapolis on Sunday and was amazed how many roads were in poor condition especially in Minnesota. Our bridges need inspection and repair to insure their safety for those who travel. A tax holiday is ridiculous and to take this out of oil profits will never pass. But, there is one area whereby we can cut govermental spending. Stop Saturday mail deliveries nationally. Nothing is done that can't wait until Monday and, the savings to the public that could be funneled to areas such as road and bridgework I am sure would save millions of dollars during the year. Any thoughts on this from others? "

just al wrote on May 5, 2008 7:46 AM:

" As far as I am concerned I am willing to take whatever break the gov. gives me. If I can pay 18 cents less for gas for a weekend you better beleive I am going to fill 'er up. Sending the wrong message? I do not think so, I am smart enough to know that it is temporary and the Big Oils will still be profiting. "

BrianGSmith wrote on May 4, 2008 5:41 PM:

" We should Nationalize oil. Cut taxes by cutting our industrial military welfare programs in half. $1.1 TRILLION to combat 19 dudes with $5.00 boxcutters. We're getting smoked and played. ANyway..we certainly know Republicans ain't the ones to handle fiscal duties responsibly......what a mess they made during their 6 years of unimpeded rule. "

JS wrote on May 4, 2008 11:27 AM:

" The American society of civil engineers predict an addition $1.6 trillion is needed over a five-year period to bring the nation's infrastructure back to good condition. The nation's infrastructure is aging and overburdened. All candidates are ignoring the issues of aging infrastructure. In terms of roads for the gas tax, many of the bridges and pavement on the interstate system are coming to age with states facing huge shortfalls to replace it. Wisconsin predicts it needs 20 billion in the next 20 years. The state only has 15 billion. Minnesota still faces .5-1.0 billion shortfall per year. Cutting 9 billion for a gas tax holiday will only make our problems worse and taxing the oil companies to make up for it is a horrible idea. "

Really wrote on May 4, 2008 10:56 AM:

" Go back and read the April 21st Editorial before Hillary jumped on board. Notice the softening up up the rhetoric in the above editorial. Gee, I wonder who they are going to endorse for the election? "

Really wrote on May 4, 2008 10:49 AM:

" tax-me-more- The Newspaper business is based on istribution. That means that a large protion of their expense is rooted in gas costs. Looking at the P&L of the Tribune and their parent company it really comes down to a 'self serving' editorial. Just like the rest of their all too often heard mantra. "

Really wrote on May 4, 2008 10:47 AM:

" I believe government subsidized gas at this time should be looked at. The option of consumers, tourists, etc pulling in their wings and staying at home far exceeds the possible cost of doing so. This level price per gallon and time will illustrate it all too well, and quickly, if it has not already. "

random annoying bozo wrote on May 4, 2008 8:13 AM:

" t-m-m, i really don't think the gas tax 'holiday' will do much good. it's just like the 'stimulus' package, it doesn't do anything except give taxpayers the pipe dream belief that 'government'and it's 'politicians' actually care about them, and is looking out for their best interests. we need long term solutions, not these do nothing political 'pablum for the masses' stunts. "

tax-me-more wrote on May 4, 2008 7:42 AM:

" The Tribune editorial board is AGAINST a TAX CUT, who would have figured? "

random annoying bozo wrote on May 4, 2008 7:40 AM:

" ah, i see who the Trib endorses for President. the 'hope and change' canidate. the sad thing about his mantra is, there is no 'hope' if government keeps taking more and more of our hard earned money. and as far as 'change', i think it would help to actually hear about policies, rather than some catchy political double speak. i find it interesting, that to 'stimulate' the economy, giving money back to taxpayers is the key. let's face it we only have too choices in this election. the 'tax and spend' Democrats and the 'borrow and spend' Republicans. the common theme is neither party wants to reduce spending. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
The Chronicle
Holmen Courier
Houston County News
Onalaska Life
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.