mindful wrote on Jul 23, 2008 8:28 PM:
" I'm happy for FSH that they now have their Urgent/Care and Emergency in the same location. But the location makes no sense to me. There had to have been a better location for the entryway to this with ambulances, etc.. And "where" are people supposed to park? Oh, and to "happymom"-please take your opinion on the right to healthcare and go back to your "happyplace". "
happymom wrote on Jul 23, 2008 8:03 PM:
" If a patient needs anything beyond a hangnail removed, they're still gonna end up taking the drive to Rochester. And to lax8751, health insurance is an easily attainable product if you avail yourself of it. Health care is not a right, as many have been brainwashed to believe. "
Rafter57 wrote on Jul 23, 2008 4:47 PM:
" je...if you go to GL Onalaska why not try the FSH Onalaska facility? It is great... "
lax8751 wrote on Jul 23, 2008 4:11 PM:
" gjmom- I don't have insurance. I'm glad you have the luxury of routine medical care. "
Josie wrote on Jul 23, 2008 3:04 PM:
" Darwin, I think I can help clarify the statement you were wondering about. The ER and Urgent Care were in 2 separate locations. Many times people are unsure if their illness is "severe enough" to warrant visit to ER or if they should go to Urgent Care. The new center will have both ER and Urgent Care in the same location and triage nurse will decide which department sees you. Hope this helps. "
gjmom wrote on Jul 23, 2008 2:02 PM:
" To Lax8751: Was this really needed? Can we accomodate 2 ER's? I am not sure who you are insured by but my insurance company mandates where I am seen for my medical care. I want where ever I go to be state of the art. As far as inadequate "walk-in" service, this should eliminate "flow" problems that occur in some clinics. Also, please remember Urgent Care and ER's are not your doctor's office. They are dictated by TRIAGE and ACCUITY not first come-first served. Throat cultures will wait, chest pain will not. If you were having the heart attack would you want to wait for Joe Blow's throat culture? "
sp0506 wrote on Jul 23, 2008 11:20 AM:
" This was very-much needed. I agree, it was easier to go to Gundersen for "walk-in" issues. "
Darwin wrote on Jul 23, 2008 11:18 AM:
" What an odd statement: "This is a model truly designed with the patient's needs in mind."
As opposed to...?
It is a remarkable day when medical centers are designed with patients' needs in mind. "
lax8751 wrote on Jul 23, 2008 11:17 AM:
" I have to ask if this is really necessary. Can the La Crosse market accommodate two ERs? I wonder if this $ would have been better spent on providing health care to the uninsured. Noting the extensive "advertising" of both GL & Skemp, it seems they could have used some of their public relations budget for the construction costs. "
je wrote on Jul 23, 2008 10:14 AM:
" I hope Franciscan Skemp has indeed updated their very inadequate urgent care/"walk in" clinic. My primary physician is at Franciscan-Skemp. I go there for all of my routine medical care. My husband's primary doctor is at Gundersen-Lutheran. If I need "walk-in" clinic treatment, I go to Gundersen-Lutheran in Onalaska. I don't have an entire day to spend at Franciscan-Skemp for a throat culture or routine stitches. "