Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > Opinion > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Saturday, October 11, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (10 comment(s))

Don’t be so rigid in applying a new anti-smoking ordinance


.
La Crosse County officials are working toward a countywide smoke-free ordinance — which would ban smoking in all workplaces and public places.

That’s the good news.
The bad news is the committee working on the law is refusing to consider allowing businesses to set up outdoor smoking areas — or even allow people to go outside a bar for a smoke.

Smoke-free laws are groundbreaking. Not everyone agrees with the concept. And bars, some of which tend to attract more smokers than many businesses, are particularly sensitive about the plan.

One committee member who opposed the ordinance said, “I don’t like it as an entire blanket rule.” He said the issue should be left to the free choice of individuals.

Unfortunately, indoor smoking affects nonsmoking as well as smoking employees and patrons.

And, while employees theoretically have the opportunity to seek jobs in nonsmoking businesses, in today’s economy that’s by no means a sure thing.

So, the idea of an indoor smoking ban is a positive thing — and, given the trends throughout the country, it’s the wave of the future.

Given all that, does it make sense to prevent business from establishing outdoor smoking areas?

Some communities with smoking bans — including Minneapolis — have not chosen to take such a rigid stand. In Minneapolis, it’s common to see outdoor seating areas for smokers.

Why should La Crosse County be alone among communities with smoking bans in preventing

smokers from conveniently going outside to feed their habit?

By all means, let’s take steps to ban indoor smoking in workplaces and other public places.

But in the process, let’s not make the law so rigid that smokers can’t even go outside — or sit in an outdoor smoking area — to satisfy their habits.

Let’s use a little common sense as we move toward a more smoke-free society.
.



 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

wiseup wrote on Oct 28, 2008 10:12 PM:

" Now we find out the truth. It isn't second hand smoke that is so dangerous, it was really the interior of your car. Dangerous, deadly, poisons in the seat, dash and carpets that seeped and creeped into your body while you were on the cell phone and driving. Apparently Porsche 911's are the least dangerous and I always wanted one of those! Better get a lawyer to sue the automakers and better start a ban poisonous autos activist campaign! "

wiseup wrote on Oct 25, 2008 9:59 PM:

" If you don't drink or go to bars you should have NO SAY in how they run their business. BUTT OUT! "

thomasp wrote on Oct 17, 2008 10:46 AM:

" I believe all public places: government buildings, hospitals and anywhere else a person has to go to now and than should be smoke free.
I believe any private owned business that an individual has a personal choice to enter or not: bars, restaurants, bowling alleys etc.. should be left to the owners to decide what type of customer is best suited for their establishment. If you as a customer do not like that, do not go there.
This philosphy also applies to employees , if do not wish to work in a smoking enviroment find a different occupation.
I quit smoking about 15 years ago after being a pack-a-day smoker for nearly 12. I won't go to restaurant that allows smoking, nor do I go to bars because of the smoke and because I'm not a big drinker anymore.
That's MY personally choice. "

picklesplease wrote on Oct 15, 2008 6:46 PM:

" elocs, you hit the nail on the head.

And I also believe that wiseup needs follow his/her own advice. Imagine what a breakthrough that would be.

bb, couldn't agree more. "

bb wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:45 PM:

" Wiseup? Liberals control the rights of others?

Um 2 topics, gay marriage and abortion, discuss. "

Theguy wrote on Oct 11, 2008 12:17 AM:

" I am a former smoker. I would rather have no smoking inside businesses. I have no problem if a separate area is set up for smokers. It would actually be a good thing. Let's try to work together to get this worked out. Right now it's almost like the Republicans against the Democrats. Both are wrong in some aspects, but we have to pick one side or the other!WORKING TOGETHER is the key! There are too many people that think their way is the only way! "

wiseup wrote on Oct 10, 2008 10:37 AM:

" Liberals always go too far with their need to control others, their need to punish the rich, their need to excuse bad behavior and their need to overexaggerate and constantly complain! How hypocritical of liberals to demand smoking bans for tobacco but want smoking pot legalized! "

Double A wrote on Oct 10, 2008 9:40 AM:

" The measure will surely die with that type of rigidity. Ridiculous. "

elocs wrote on Oct 10, 2008 9:20 AM:

" The truth of the matter is that both tobacco and alcohol are legal products. Alcohol has long had restrictions on how it may be sold, who may buy and consume it, and where it may be consumed. More of those same type of restrictions are now being applied to tobacco.

Has this smoke free ordinance been passed? If not, perhaps the actions to not allow smoking outside is a poison pill designed to kill the measure. "

wiseup wrote on Oct 10, 2008 12:28 AM:

" WHAT??? Maybe the Tribune should not feed their habit and NOT ACCEPT ANY ADS for cigarettes or tobacco or alcohol. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.