wakeup wrote on Oct 11, 2008 7:21 PM:
" Good grief! Another great argument against religion. "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 10, 2008 11:46 AM:
" 'Kevin' what are you talking about?... "
Kevin wrote on Oct 9, 2008 7:57 PM:
" Oh all right, my daughter can wait 1 minute. Hiroshima, what did we discover there? How to harness the power of the atom for destructive purposes? Hasn't that already been done in nature, didn't we just learn how to copy nature, through the power of, wait a minute, math & observation.....I think the the chinese, and mayans etc...new the sun was the center of the universe long before copernicus. The Mayan calendar etc... speaks for itself....and yes, nuclear physics is just applied math. You probably think we discovered the gene for blue eyes as well, when it has been there all this time, waiting for us to build the instrumentation required to see it. Plato I think said, we are born knowing everything, we just need to remember it. "
Kevin wrote on Oct 9, 2008 7:48 PM:
" Wow,,,it is really too bad that I have to work. Reading BS's response, I am not sure to start with cynical satire, or follow up to PoBs responses....Soooo much to do and so little time.....And now my daughter is home, so I will go be a good & productive father....Please, please though BS give us the link or the magazine article or whatever, where 'life' has been created by scientists, from nothing. Then show me an article or link with a joint, or blood vessel, or stent or something that lasts as long as the body, with our 'advanced' technologies. "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 8, 2008 12:52 PM:
" 'Big Spender' indeed states something quite apt: yes no uh 'doubt' atheists such as he PREFER 'PO'B' and his ilk PRECISELY because their 'militancy' parallels his own. As I've said they are truly 'brothers of the spear' and are vastly entertaining and engaging -- to each other. 'PO'B' is one 'one eyed jack' in the deck and 'Big' is the other. As for 'militant' applied to atheists -- yeah the militant atheist IS the verbal equivalent to a bombthrower exactly; he blows himself up too in his obvious enjoyment in disparaging ALL religionists as 'morons,' 'fools' etc. Sure I think my term is as apt as 'Spender's identification as the other side of 'PO'B'... "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 7, 2008 11:58 PM:
" For a good break down of some of the major problems with abiogenesis see this site:
http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/chemlife.html
If you check out the site, you'll see they reference their statements to other science sources, and not the Bible. "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 7, 2008 11:57 PM:
" Obviously BS uses selective reading.
Here's another quote from another site...
"One of the biggest hurdles faced by Origins of life research is the fact that modern life at some point incorporated the dichotomy between replicating molecules and the effector molecules they code for. Life (the objection goes) would have had to develop two distinct but wholly dependent systems simultaneously. It is safe to say that this scenario is so unlikely that it is effectively impossible......There are enormous gaps in all Origin of Life models."
Your assumption that science has shown that life can come from non-life is far from proven. "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 7, 2008 11:03 PM:
" Bates,
Life's not that hard, even your own links support abiogenesis--read them!
This can be synthesized artificially or via nature, no god required:
http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/full/68/3/518?view=long&pmid=15353568
"A minimal metabolism. The minimal cell can obtain its more basic components from the environment: glucose, fatty acids, amino acids, adenine, guanine, uracil, and coenzyme precursors (nicotinamide, riboflavin, folate, pantothenate, and pyridoxal). Each box includes the metabolic transformations classified in major groups of pathways: glycolysis, phospholipid biosynthesis, nonoxidative pentose-phosphate pathway, nucleotide biosynthesis, synthesis of enzymatic cofactors, and synthesis of protein precursors, i.e., aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNA)"
http://mmbr.asm.org/content/vol68/issue3/images/large/zmr0030420620001.jpeg "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 7, 2008 7:09 PM:
" BS,
You're relying on HUGE assumptions, like:
"First, that the pre-biotic atmosphere was chemically reductive; second, that nature found a way to synthesize cytosine; third, that nature also found a way to synthesize ribose; fourth, that nature found the means to assemble nucleotides into polynucleotides; fifth, that nature discovered a self-replicating molecule; and sixth, that having done all that, nature promoted a self-replicating molecule into a full system of coded chemistry.
These assumptions are not only vexing but progressively so, ending in a serious impediment to thought. That, indeed, may be why a number of biologists have lately reported a weakening of their commitment to the RNA world altogether, and a desire to look elsewhere for an explanation of the emergence of life on earth." -http://www.discovery.org/a/3209 "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 7, 2008 7:08 PM:
" BS,
Kevin's information isn't 30 years behind. Here's another example:
"As of 2004, no one has yet synthesized a "protocell" using basic components which has the necessary properties of life (the so-called "bottom-up-approach"). Without such a proof-of-principle, explanations have tended to be short on specifics."-http://www.bio-medicine.org/Biology-Definition/Origin_of_life/
You'll recognize I didn't cut and paste from a "Creation Science" site, but just plain science websites. This information isn't 30 years old, but current. "
MidwestAtheist wrote on Oct 7, 2008 4:21 PM:
" To: Big Spender: You are spot on in your posts here. Check out www.lcafs.org.
To Welch: Again with your "Militant Atheist". Tell me, what definition of the word "Militant" are you using to label Big Spender thusly? Is having an opinion and expressing it in a potentially provocative manner "Militant"? Is Big Spender in the same category as Militant Islamist? Is using rhetoric equivalent to using bombs? "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 7, 2008 2:05 PM:
" To Welch, re: "I understand and hardly expect you to -- but you TOO OFTEN seem to enjoy making these obviously 'hot' charges about Christians and all other religionists as 'stupid.'"
-------------------------------------
Are these 'non-literalists' really true Christians at all? They seem somewhat Spinoza-like to me. If they are, then they cannot amount to more than a tenth of a percent of the Xtian population; they're vastly outnumbered by the snake-twirlers and those who 'speak in tongues.'
I've more respect for the literalists, with their delusions, 'moronicity' and all: at least they don't hem and haw about what it is they are really about. "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 7, 2008 1:12 PM:
" Despite the perponderance on the Trib blog literalists are NOT the ONLY Christians -- I KNOW MANY much more thoughtful and perceptive 'believers.' You cannot share or confirm their beliefs -- I understand and hardly expect you to -- but you TOO OFTEN seem to enjoy making these obviously 'hot' charges about Christians and all other religionists as 'stupid.' That's just throwing a lighted match to see the explosion -- it 'enlightens' no one and is eminently unfair and moreover WRONG... "
DJ: wrote on Oct 7, 2008 12:07 PM:
" ...aside from all those obscure church rules seemingly made and/or interpreted by men, if God truly didn't want or intend for women to become pastors, why does he keep calling them to the vocation? "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:56 PM:
" To Kevin, re: " We can attach electrodes to different parts of the brain, body, plants, etc and product responses to stimuli. We can introduce dyes and radiation traces etc...to follow and see which parts of the brain are active when different thoughts are produced. We can produce artifical rules of decision making into computer programs, but we have yet to 'create' life."
You're about thirty years out of date: look up what they're doing now. Start with molecular biology: it'll shock you. "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:50 PM:
" To Kevin, re: "Science doesn't truly discover anything, it merely creates mathematic models"
So Hiroshima never happened?
Nuclear physics is therefore 'just' a mathematical model?
Copernicus only came up with a mathematical model when he posited the earth goes 'round the sun?
Newton's 'mathematical model' was good enough to land the Cassini probe on the surface of Saturn's moon, Titan. I know of no religious text that tells how to do that. "
Kevin wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:38 PM:
" Make 'BANG' out of letters big enough too satisfy your scientific mind. "
Kevin wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:37 PM:
" And God Said : Let there be light.....
BANG!
And there was light. "
Kevin wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:27 PM:
" We can attach electrodes to different parts of the brain, body, plants, etc and product responses to stimuli. We can introduce dyes and radiation traces etc...to follow and see which parts of the brain are active when different thoughts are produced. We can produce artifical rules of decision making into computer programs, but we have yet to 'create' life. We cannot even make an artifical joint that will last a lifetime. Yes truly the scientific method is the master of the universe. We can barely predict weather 2 days out. "
Kevin wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:24 PM:
" Big Spender : Science doesn't truly discover anything, it merely creates mathematic models that allow people to understand that which God already knows and has created. From that perspective science is no more than a self fulfilling prophecy of how God 'could' have created the universe. Science has yet to present anything that doesn't already exist in what you refer to as mythology. "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 6, 2008 3:17 PM:
" Welch,
I'd have agreed thirty years ago, but science has moved into realms once considered forever hidden to us, including the inner workings of the human brain. Cosmologists and physicists are pounding at doors once considered the province of a god: extra dimensions, multiverses, and m-theory might indeed find your god/superalien for you--that's where you will get your proof: physics. It is in this regard that I find religion so off the track: while you rightly say that the literalist version of things is wrong, that's not what a substantial body of believers say. Masses of Americans really think Noah's Ark is real.
Graves, Darwin, Freud, and Einstein missed out on some earthshaking modern scientific discoveries that would perhaps have altered their viewpoints radically.
The 'Claudius' of science wasn't so dumb after all (concerning what's most profound). "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 6, 2008 12:55 PM:
" 'Big Spender' you ought to be familiar by now with my MANY criticisms of literalism in ALL religions; I stand by those critiques and I am NOT 'intimidated' by Christians -- EVEN 'PO'B' might agree with that! I have always said that mythologies are NOT to be taken 'literally' as 'history' but as metaphoric accounts of humanity and especially of its 'inner life,' its personal and collective psyches. Religions express, as Freud WELL KNEW, DEEP PSYCHOLOGICAL conflicts and primal dilemmas. And as Robert Graves understood, the mythologies also reveal political and social struggles. Religion is NOT science per se OR history -- I have written that OVER and OVER; but it is not a 'stupid' thing; it reveals the profound and dark 'secrets' of the human mind... "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 6, 2008 9:59 AM:
" To PO Bats, re: "I already said that miracles don't contradict science because science can not measure the supernatural. Just because some people misleading believe that men had one less rib than women doesn't make the miracle of Creation of woman false."
Wrong again. There is no such thing as the supernatural. That's all make-believe: stay away from fairy tales. It's all right suspend reality by watching Eragon or read 'The Hobbit' now and then, but, when the movie is over, the book read, you've got to bring your mind back to reality. Zeus doesn't send thunderbolts from the sky, in reality; there are no talking snakes, in reality. Snap out of your fairy tale world! "
PHIL OSIFER wrote on Oct 5, 2008 8:51 PM:
" Most of you people need to remove the twig from your eyes. I defend Pastor and I am not a WELS member. I notice that you people also condem the Roman Catholic Church for it's stand on abortion. Which Biden,Kerry,Kennedy and many other Dems support and they are all Roman Catholics [in name only my I add]. If we do not stick to or get back to a moral code in this country we are doomed. Way to go Pastor "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 5, 2008 8:26 PM:
" BS,
I already said that miracles don't contradict science because science can not measure the supernatural. Just because some people misleading believe that men had one less rib than women doesn't make the miracle of Creation of woman false. Some people today see the taking of the rib to make woman similar to Jirasic Park using DNA from a drop of blood to make a dinosaur.
Just because Big Spender doesn't believe something, that doesn't make it false. God is far greater than your limited understanding. "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 5, 2008 4:47 PM:
" To PO Bats, re: "As for Science vs. Christianity, you will see that there is no contradiction."
Wrong. Read your Bible.
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/science/long.html
"God fashions a woman out of one of Adam's ribs.
Because of this story, it was commonly believed (and sometimes it is still said today) that males have one less rib than females. When Vesalius showed in 1543 that the number of ribs was the same in males and females, it created a storm of controversy"
Genesis:
"2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof"
"2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man " "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 5, 2008 4:41 PM:
" To Welch, re: "However I find the rhetoric of militant atheism just as off-putting and JUST AS simplistic many times."
Why convolute the simple? Christianity just happens to be 'in vogue,' in Western societies--I suspect that's why you elevate its ideological status above that of ancient religion, aka mythology. Perhaps, I'm wrong here; perhaps you're intimidated by militant Christianity on a subconcious level such that you're afraid to give offence.
Christianity has no more validity than ancient mythology. Christianity is just modern mythology--the truth of that need not be made more complex than it is. Faith in Christian mythology is dangerous: delusional faith leads to delusional politics--that's why we get moronic Bushes and Reagans in high office. "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 5, 2008 3:06 PM:
" 'PO'B' uses his Christianity to 'sacramentalize' his political positions (Republican) and demonize opponents (Democrats, especially Obama). He denigrates all other religions, even Christian denominations (especially Catholic) that he deems 'not Christian' by HIS interpretations. His is a simplistic, often vicious view and I've said that over and over. However I find the rhetoric of militant atheism just as off-putting and JUST AS simplistic many times. I regret I have to say that and yet 'PO'B' doesn't change and neither will you 'Big Spender' -- I realize that (I'm not uh 'delusional') but I too MUST say what I BELIEVE... "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 5, 2008 12:54 PM:
" One other thing, Big Spender makes the false accusation that Christianity does not allow open examination. Read any one of the 'Evidence' books by Lee Strobel and you will see what honestly investigating the evidence of Christianity can lead to.
As for Science vs. Christianity, you will see that there is no contradiction. That is because science can only study what it can observe, which is what we call natural. Science can not study the supernatural like miracles. There are many scientific facts that are stated in the Bible long before they were observed by science. ("He suspends the earth over nothing" (Job 26:7) is just one of many examples.) "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 5, 2008 12:45 PM:
" It's plain to see that people like Big Spender and Mack have a chip on their shoulder against God and don't have a clear understanding of Christian beliefs. There are too many misdirectional rabbit trails in their posts to address them all, but here are a few easy answers:
Believing the Bible is entirely true, doesn't make someone insane or crazy.
On the issue of Palin praying that America follow God's plan for Iraq, you should watch the video yourself. Fox news got it right, which is one reason they have a larger viewership then the other net works. http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/12/abc-edits-out-palin-objection-to-holy-war-question/
Thirdly, I have not yet heard of any pastor or church telling their parisoners to vote for Palin. "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 5, 2008 12:23 PM:
" The New Testament is the guide for Christians so to be complete, Joe should probably have looked at what the New Testament says. It alsways says things like "But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man.." 1 Tim. 2:12 or that Deacons must be "men of dignity" (1 Tim. 3:8). When you look further at Paul's teachings we see that the bishop/overseer is to be the husband of one wife (1 Tim. 3:2) who manages his household well and has a good reputation (1 Tim. 3:4-5, 7).
This doesn't prevent women from having certain leadership roles in the church, but those roles have to answer to a male elder/deacon/pastor. If you don't like it, take it up with God, the inspirational author of the Bible.
Here is a good thorough look at the issue:
http://www.carm.org/questions/womenpastors.htm "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 4, 2008 6:06 PM:
" To Welch, re: comments
You're injecting yourself into a wider war here: my remarks are part of an ongoing flame war with several others on this site...my comments are primarily a set of counterpunches to theirs. I didn't 'go nuclear' on these issues first, FYI. "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 4, 2008 5:47 PM:
" To Welch, "Christians are NOT 'delusional morons' ... TOO MANY FINE Christian people who are really 'liberal' and generous hearted that this atheistic militancy just gets FAR too overdone... "
It's not silly and vicious: one can be delusional and stupid, yet be well-intentioned. There are, to this day, delusional morons in Greece who still follow the ancient religion that worships Zeus. I'm sure that many of them are of kindly intent too.
Religion, for too long, has been given a free pass within the world of ideas. Perhaps that's because anyone questioning it would be burned at the stake, etc. Let religion be subject to the same scrutiny that science is subject to. Religionists bash science for evolution, the Big Bang, and so on--they can dish it out but they can't take it! "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 4, 2008 5:37 PM:
" To M. Welch, re: "Religion has its sophistication too and mythologies their profundity and 'Big's CONSTANT denigration of 'everything' is really tedious,"
You can squeeze profundity out of any form of nonsense if you get convoluted enough. But, at the end of it all, when you wake up and get a grip, it's still nonsense. For example, Tolkien's fairy tale "The Lord of the Rings" is found the virtues of loyalty, perserverance, etc. But, it's still a fairy tale. If you thought hobbits are real, then you'd be a delusional moron. Christianity is literally just a much a fairy tale as Tolkien's works.
Mr. Welch, I know, having read and respected your comments, that you value politeness. I respect that. I'm not here to be polite, however, when I hear someone posit bunk, I'll call it bunk. Christianity is bunk. "
county resident wrote on Oct 4, 2008 1:08 PM:
" ok one more thing; If it wasn't for women Jesus would have had no one waiting for Him after the ressurection, cause the guys went running and Mary hang around. Half of the first century church wouldn't have had houses to meet in. "
county resident wrote on Oct 4, 2008 1:03 PM:
" furthermore Jesus came to do away with cultural driven rules. Barring women from the pastorate speaks of Pharisee-ism. Why put God in a box? The apostle Paul was addressing issues of his day which is what Pastors are called to do today. Today women are in positions of leadership all over the workplace and HOMES. "
county resident wrote on Oct 4, 2008 1:00 PM:
" Rev Deb huber is the lady head paster of New Beginnings Assembly of God in downtown Lax and she is an excellent pastor. The Apostle Paul also told women to wear head coverings in the same epistles these churches use to keep gifted women out of the pastorate. I don't see these church enforcing that one. God uses whom He calls. "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 4, 2008 12:51 PM:
" I've said it on another 'Faith' story and since 'Big Spender' has found it necessary to make three identical comments today I'll repeat mine here too: 'Big' is becoming or has become the 'Phil O'Bates' of the militant atheist view; i. e. he pushes an unrelenting, much too belabored view of ALL 'Christians' and their beliefs -- probably in the same way the new Bill Maher attack on religion does? -- and while turnabout has an element of ironic 'revenge' certainly, 'Big' is making himself as much an unfair caricature as 'PO'B' with this overdone 'moronic' bit. Religion has its sophistication too and mythologies their profundity and 'Big's CONSTANT denigration of 'everything' is really tedious, silly and even ignorant, ultimately... "
TheVoiceofReason23 wrote on Oct 4, 2008 12:32 PM:
" This is what's wrong with most church's today, they try to tell there followers who to vote for. Sarah Palin is woefully unprepared to lead this country, but because she's a religious zelot the church endorses her. Joe Biden is Catholic, Barack Obama is a christian, they just choose not to force those beliefs on others that may not share them. It's time for area church's to stop trying to make the Republican party, the party of God, it's not. They try to make followers that vote Democratic feel like they are less of a christian for doing so, and this is wrong. Republicans take care of the rich, and offer no help for working people struggling. Ask yourself what would Jesus do?? "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 4, 2008 12:29 PM:
" Christians are NOT 'delusional morons' -- that's silly and vicious. The irony of Joe Orso's story is evident but I've known TOO MANY FINE Christian people who are really 'liberal' and generous hearted that this atheistic militancy just gets FAR too overdone... "
Mack wrote on Oct 4, 2008 12:15 PM:
" It sounds like Rev. Mark Bartling is a poster boy for what is wrong with religion today. We've all seen Palin in front of her church telling the congregation that the Iraq war is a mission from God. Just like George Bush. There's not enough lipstick in the world to fix this chick. "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 4, 2008 10:28 AM:
" Anyone who'd inflict Palin on America is in league with the devil.
Palin believes that the Xtian bible is literally true: she believes the talking snake story literally happened. She believes that men get swallowed up by whales. She believes in witches:
"Palin Witchcraft"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwkb9_zB2Pg
Proof Christians, such as the pastor in this article, are delusional morons:
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/ "