Michael Welch wrote on Oct 30, 2008 12:12 PM:
" Stop 'sheeshing' and tell us about it or are we supposed to guess?... "
Seriously Now wrote on Oct 28, 2008 2:06 PM:
" Haven't any of you religious master debaters heard of the theory called "the dome of many-colored glass?"
Sheesh. "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 27, 2008 2:51 PM:
" Darwin was born February 12, 1809 -- EXACTLY on Lincoln's brithday. Might we 'co-celebrate' two men who struggled so with 'belief' and tried to find the truth as best they could? Seems appropriate... "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 27, 2008 12:22 PM:
" I knew a Muslim who told me that Christianity was too onerous a religion because it expected too much of people. Judaism is supposedly too mired in myriad and complicated rules and regulations but Christians believe in a God (Jesus) who wants them to behave as saints and commands them to do so! Consequently the revelation of Muhammed was necessary, for in Islam the 'rules' are confined to five basic behaviors (the most difficult for the poor, a pilgrimage to Mecca, is NOT required if unfeasible) and humans are NOT expected to behave re: Jesus' extraordinary example. Therefore Islam is the most 'realistic' and doable. However the great corruption of Christianity I think IS the notion of making a difficult religion 'easy,' i. e. ALL you HAVE to do is 'believe' in Jesus; you aren't EXPECTED to model yourself on him. So: Christians can be cruel AND -- be saved!... "
Midwestatheist wrote on Oct 27, 2008 10:19 AM:
" I hope everyone enjoyed the debate, there was standing room only. What a success! Thanks to Joe Orso for helping us promote the event. I thought it went great, and I had many good conversations with people before and afterwards. I hope we can do more events like this in the future. Watch for some sort of event in February in celebration of Darwin Day. "
Eddie wrote on Oct 26, 2008 10:24 PM:
" Costello: "You're brainwashed!" Abbott: "No, I am NOT brainwashed!" Costello: "How would you know??" "
ChristianMom wrote on Oct 26, 2008 10:23 PM:
" To: Darwinism, I don't think Phil was scaring anyone, or calling them names. He was informing us of some language that Big Spender uses. Anyway, God is GOOD! And Phil, I think the Christian Flag is just living and letting your Christ Light shine. I don't think we'll win any converts on the Trib Blogs however. It's mostly negativity here. "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 26, 2008 6:19 PM:
" to Double A,
I honestly don't understand your question. If you are asking if anyone can obey all of God's laws, then the answer is no. That is why Jesus came, lived by all the laws, committed no sin, and yet paid the penalty for sin...death. Because Jesus conquered death, and sits at the right hand of God the Father, he can grant a 'pardon' for the penalty of the sins of those who accept him as savior, in this life.
As a side note...what did you mean by the 'Christian flag'? "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 26, 2008 6:13 PM:
" to wheezer,
Yes, I can say brainwashed. In fact I am so thankful that Jesus can wash my brain and my sould of sin stains, when I ask him. Can you say filthy brain? We all live with what we choose. If you choose not to believe in Jesus, then God will grant you the consequence of that choice. "
Double A wrote on Oct 26, 2008 12:38 PM:
" I conducted a study in college where hundreds of people viewed the same advertisement for social change - one copy of the ad had the emblem of a 'Christian' group and the other copy had the emblem of a 'Community' group. There was an attached survey with questions about the various social problems. People viewing the ad brought to them by the 'Community' group had in-depth commentary about the issues. But people viewing the same ad brought to them by the 'Christian' group didn't say much at all about the issue, rather they said: "This group is trying to push their agenda on me." "
Double A wrote on Oct 26, 2008 12:31 PM:
" I have a faith that God is real. But I don't aspire to talk about Jesus and about parables and what not. I think this is largely due to what MW is saying: There is so, so much hypocrisy associated with Christianity. My question is: Could a true believer live according to God's laws the best he/she could, but NOT go to church and not fly the Christian flag and not EVER say the name Jesus? If not, why not, and who enacted this qualifier? "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 25, 2008 3:47 PM:
" My own question in the 'What would Jesus do' category would be 'Who would JESUS BOMB?' (Answer please.) I wonder too if Jesus today would recall the rich man who has gathered his harvest into his barns and proclaims a la John McCain -- 'I'm RICH! Congratulations are due to me!' And that night the angel appears and declares 'Joe THOU FOOL! Don't you know THIS NIGHT thy life is required of thee?!' Has John McCain EVER read that parable? Has 'Joe the plumber'? Has 'Phil O'Bates'??? Republicans winning, the rich getting richer, the poor poorer (they're undeserving lazy stupid slobs you see), a VERY FEW folks bearing the entire fighting burdens of endless wars while even fewer profit hugely from those wars -- THIS sounds like something JESUS would 'approve'? Not to me... "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 25, 2008 3:35 PM:
" The New Testament is a compilation of the Jesus myth, that of the rejected messiah who attempts a 'renewal' of Jewish fervor and faith before the coming of the 'end times' which Jesus believed would occur in the lifetimes of his disciples. Jesus therefore preaches a society based upon extreme compassion and generosity, especially to its poorest and most bereft -- Jesus certainly believes in 'spreading wealth,' not 'gathering it into barns' and he considers wealth so useless that he counsels rich folk to give it ALL away 'to the poor' and seek SPIRITUAL riches ONLY. He is of course seen as a 'dangerous radical' and at the opportune moment executed by the political authorities. His followers attempt to arrange (see Acts 4) a 'COMMUNISTIC' arrangement among themselves in which NO ONE controls ANY wealth but the 'commune' so to speak dispenses it. Jesus was NOT a 'plumber' eh... "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 25, 2008 3:23 PM:
" The Bible is NOT a history book nor a science text, nor ought it to be cut into such by procrustean arguments. The Bible is FIRST AND FOREMOST A RELIGIOUS BOOK which presents a mythological account of the Hebrew-Israelite-Jewish folk as a model and standard as well as a rendering of human folly and disappointment. The so called 'Old Testament' is a compilation of the Jewish spiritual experience in antiquity seen as an illustrative 'story' that mirrors humankind's and it ends in momentary triumph. The Jewish scriptures you see 'end' with the renewal of the temple post-Babylonian exile, NOT with any predictions of the messiah as that is the CHRISTIAN REarrangement of the texts. Perserverance in a hostile world is the Jewish 'lesson' -- loyalty to the 'teaching,' the Torah. ('Teaching' by the way is a better translation than 'law.') So primarily it's a spiritual JOURNEY, not 'history'... "
Michael Welch wrote on Oct 25, 2008 3:09 PM:
" 'Phil O'Bates' is a Republican flack essentially POSING as a 'Christian' in order to sanctify his political push. His biblical literalism is simplistic and uninformed but by evangelical web sites and buttressed with a well known tactic scorned by real scholars called 'proof texting' which 'PO'B' assiduously employs. The 'spirit' of Jesus is beyond him; he himself indulges in attacks on Barack Obama that imply Obama is a 'terrorist' sympathizer and a 'secret' Muslim and 'PO'B' relies heavily on emphasizing Obama's Arabic middle name 'Hussein.' Wherever 'PO'B' goes there's his slime trail of innuendo and smear supposedly airbrushed away by his self vaunted piety. He's well recognized (as we read below) and his real agenda is hardly mysterious. Provide him a 'fresh' idea about religion and he'll shear it like a lost lamb until it's dry as the bones in Ezekiel. 'PO'B' is in fact a KILLER of religious wonder... "
Darwinism wrote on Oct 25, 2008 8:20 AM:
" Isn't it ironic that the self confessed christian PO'B resorts to fear mongering, coercion and name calling of those that don't believe what he does. If that's what I'll become by joining that belief system I'm happy where I'm at. Hey Phil WWJD? "
ryeguy wrote on Oct 25, 2008 6:51 AM:
" Re nuclear energy and how it works and faith: this is "faith" with a meaning that is almost exactly the opposite of Christian or Muslim or Hebrew "faith." The former means trust that the experiment results were reported properly and can be reproduced. The latter means that there is no way to get there without a belief axiom to begin with. The former confirms out hypotheses through observation and experimental probing of nature. The latter is accepted blindly based upon ancient texts that can never be reproduced. The word faith should be stricken from the language and replaced with two new words that describe what really is involved. "
ryeguy wrote on Oct 25, 2008 6:47 AM:
" Most scientists are agnostic. Many are atheist. But I dare say many are also quite spiritual in the sense of awe and wonder at the scope and complexity and beauty of their universe and how it works. Is the bible literal? Of course not. Is it fable? Sure, at least parts of it. Is it a great book? I think so. Live and let live. India lauches a moon probe with a date chosen by astronomers. Do we laugh? No. Astronauts say a prayer before launch. Do we mock? No. I actually agree with POB that many atheists are arrogant in their cerainty. But then so are most Christians and Muslims I know. "
Wheezer wrote on Oct 25, 2008 5:58 AM:
" Phil....can you say "brainwashed"!? "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 25, 2008 4:28 AM:
" On a side note to all those Christians out there lurking on these blogs, pay attention to comments by people like big spender.
Big spender is an Obama supporter. Big Spender in one post will call believers of God idiots or uneducated morons, yet in another post he will support a man who claims to be a Christian, Obama. So either he doesn't really believe Obama believes in God and is therefore not a backwards moron, or he believes that Obama is a useful tool to advance his cause that would take believers out of the political square.
In short, if you are a Christian, but are planning on voting for Obama, realize that it is people like big spender you are being joined with. "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 25, 2008 4:20 AM:
" As a parent I understand, in a way, why God values faith over 'proof'.
Example: (in one incredibly long run-on sentence) When you tell your kids that they have to do something, and they ask you why, and you know that they are too young to comprehend the full reason, so you say something like "because it's best" and they accept your word and do it vs. demanding 'proof', you realize that they love you and trust you.
Does that mean we can't or shouldn't questions things? NO! Of course we should ask, but realize that we are too limited to understand everything.
Some people call Christians arrogant, but I see atheists as arrogant, because they assume they have more knowledge to end all of their questions about life and its meaning. Christians realize we don't have all of the answers, but God does. "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Oct 25, 2008 4:13 AM:
" The Bible is fact, but in this life, you will only know about that through faith. If you die without exercising your faith in the Bible, then when you finally have the 'proof' at your judgement day, it will be too late.
I imagine people like Baker will say he doesn't believe anything he can't 'prove', but we all accept things WE can't prove. As an example, many people can't 'prove' exactly how nuclear energy works, but they have faith in other people who tell them how it works. "
Big Spender wrote on Oct 25, 2008 2:15 AM:
" Let's just come out and say it: the Xtian Bible, like the Koran, like Dianetics, like the Bhagavad Gita, is just a set of simplistic kiddie fairy stories:
"Einstein: Bible Is 'Primitive, Pretty Childish'"
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,355323,00.html
The 'Freedom from Religion' folks are doing humanity a great service: progress and advancement can only occur when foolish religious superstition is cast aside.
www.atheists.org
"Quarks and Leptons"
http://www.amazon.com/Quarks-Leptons-Introductory-Particle-Physics/dp/0471887412 "